South Africa's Gen Z Economics

A source directory on the generational economic divide in South Africa — youth unemployment, the housing lockout, stagnant wages, and the “black tax” dimension the US debate misses. 126 verified sources, ordered by data validity. Every data point is year-referenced.

Compiled September 2026 · parallels the US “Gen Z Economics” thesis, localized to South Africa

Youth unemployment (15–34)
36.9%Q1 201545.8%Q1 2026
Stats SA QLFS
Youth unemployment (15–24)
50.3%Q1 201560.9%Q1 2026
Stats SA QLFS
Graduate unemployment
5.6%Q1 201612.2%Q1 2026
Stats SA QLFS — doubled
Entry-level purchasing power
2008−21%2025
TEFL Academy report
Average rent
R1,5002005R9,051Q4 2024
PayProp — up to 64% of income
Household food basket
R1,5002005R5,452Apr 2026
PMBEJD Index
Median first-time buyer age
23–251960s38–402024–25
Lightstone / BetterBond
Under-35 share of property
47%200030%2025
Lightstone
SARB repo rate
3.50%Jul 20206.75%Nov 2025
peak 8.25% May 2023
Youth: country on wrong track
84%2025
Afrobarometer Round 10
Black tax prevalence
~70%2022
HSRC / FSCA survey
Gini coefficient
59.3199363.02014
World Bank — world's most unequal
Social Mobility Index (WEF)
#77 / 822020
SA ranked 77th of 82 countries
Generations to reach mean income
4–5OECD avg92018
SA — 2nd-worst of 30 countries (OECD)
Intergenerational earnings elasticity
0.57–0.672015
SA IGE — ~3/5 of parents' edge passed down (Piraino)
Wealth Gini (SA)
88.82022812025
UBS GWR — 3rd-highest globally
Great wealth transfer
$83T2025
UBS — to move over 20–25 yrs
Billionaire inheritance (annual)
$150.8B2023$297.8B2025
UBS — heirs’ annual haul, +36% YoY
SA dollar millionaires
41,100202548,2002026
Henley / New World Wealth
Sort:

Affordability & Wages (14)

Unemployment & Sentiment (13)

Housing Lockout (15)

Black Tax & Wealth (16)

Hard Data & Reports (14)

Video & Long-form (12)

Wealth Mobility Indices (15)

SA Wealth & Inheritance (8)

Mobility — 2024–2026 (11)

SA Wealth — 2024–2026 (8)

Stats SA QLFS Q4 2025: Youth unemployment remains critically high

The QLFS Q4 2025 media release reports the official unemployment rate at 31.4%, with youth (15–34) remaining the most vulnerable group. The youth unemployment rate increased to 43.8% in Q4 2025, with 4.6 million unemployed youth and 5.8 million employed youth. Discouraged job-seekers totalled 3.7 million nationally.

  • Q4 2025: Official unemployment rate 31.4% (down 0.5pp from 31.9% in Q3 2025)
  • Q4 2025: Youth (15–34) unemployment rate 43.8% (up 0.1pp from Q3 2025)
  • Q4 2025: 4.6 million unemployed youth; 5.8 million employed youth
  • Q4 2025: Total employed 17.1 million; total unemployed 7.8 million
  • Q4 2025: Discouraged job-seekers 3.7 million; LU4 (composite labour underutilisation) 44.5%

South Africa's Youth in the Labour Market: A Decade in Review

Stats SA's decade review shows youth unemployment (15–34) rose from 36.9% in Q1 2015 to 46.1% in Q1 2025 — a 9.2 percentage point increase. For those aged 15–24, unemployment climbed from 50.3% to 62.4%. Among 4.8 million unemployed youth in Q1 2025, 58.7% had no previous work experience. Youth without matric faced 51.6% unemployment; university graduates 23.9%.

  • Q1 2015: Youth (15–34) unemployment rate 36.9%
  • Q1 2025: Youth (15–34) unemployment rate 46.1% (+9.2pp over a decade)
  • Q1 2015: Youth (15–24) unemployment rate 50.3%
  • Q1 2025: Youth (15–24) unemployment rate 62.4%
  • Q1 2015: Youth (25–34) unemployment rate 31.4%
  • Q1 2025: Youth (25–34) unemployment rate 40.4%
  • Q1 2025: 50.2% of working-age population aged 15–34 (~20.9 million individuals)
  • Q1 2025: 58.7% of unemployed youth had no previous work experience
  • Q1 2025: ~1.9 million youth aged 15–34 classified as discouraged work-seekers
  • Q1 2025: NEET rate for 15–24 = 37.1%; for 15–34 = 45.1%
  • Q1 2025: Unemployment rate without matric = 51.6%; with matric = 47.6%; other tertiary = 37.3%; university graduates = 23.9%

ooba oobarometer Q1 2026: First-Time Homebuyer Comeback as Barriers to Entry Ease

ooba's Q1 2026 data shows first-time homebuyers accounting for 48% of all applications, up from 46.5% a year ago. The average deposit for first-time buyers fell to 8.2% of purchase price (R103,842), down from 9.6% in Q1 2025. Zero-deposit (100%) loans accounted for 60.2% of first-time buyer applications, and cost-inclusive loans rose from 0.49% (2016) to ~16% in early 2026.

  • Q1 2026: First-time buyers = 48% of all applications (up from 46.5% in Q1 2025)
  • Q1 2026: Average FTB deposit 8.2% of purchase price = R103,842 (down from 9.6% / ~R higher in Q1 2025)
  • Q1 2026: Average overall deposit 12.8% = R221,937 (down from 15.4% a year earlier)
  • Q1 2026: Average purchase price up 4.7% YoY overall; FTB prices up only 1.5% YoY
  • Q1 2026: 100% (zero-deposit) loans = 60.2% of FTB applications; 55.8% of repeat buyer applications (decade-high)
  • 2016: Cost-inclusive loans = 0.49% of FTB applications; early 2026: ~16%
  • Q1 2026: Overall approval rate 84%; prime less 0.67% average interest rate concession
  • Q1 2026: FTB average purchase price ~R990,000 (Free State), ~R1 million (Gauteng South & East)

BetterBond Property Brief — January 2026

BetterBond's January 2026 brief reports the prime lending rate at 10.25% after 150bps of cuts since Q3 2024. Home loan applications were up 8.9% YoY. Average FTB price reached just above R1.3 million with deposits down 15% YoY. Real homebuyer incomes grew 5.7% per annum. The rand strengthened 13.8% against the USD in 2025.

  • 2026-01: Prime lending rate 10.25% (cumulative 150bps cut since Q3 2024)
  • Q4 2025: Home loan applications up 8.9% YoY
  • Q4 2025: National house price growth 3.3% YoY; FTB price growth 2.2% YoY
  • 2026-01: Average FTB purchase price just above R1.3 million
  • 2026-01: Average FTB deposit down 15% YoY
  • 2025: Rand strengthened 13.8% against USD
  • 2026 forecast: GDP growth 1.5%–2%

Data, Demographics and Purchase Decisions — Absa Vehicle and Asset Finance at DealerCon

Absa Vehicle and Asset Finance presented data at the inaugural DealerCon showing that vehicle finance applications have grown 65% over a decade (~5% per year), incomes risen 35%, and vehicle values financed grown 54%. However, affordability has deteriorated: the average monthly instalment rose from 14.3% of income a decade ago to 16.1% today. Gen Z buyers are constrained by income, remain brand-conscious, and prioritize affordability.

  • ~2015: Average monthly vehicle instalment = 14.3% of customer's income
  • 2025: Average monthly vehicle instalment = 16.1% of customer's income
  • Past decade: Vehicle finance applications +65% (~5%/year); income levels +35%; vehicle values financed +54%
  • 2025: Absa studied 70,000 customers; most active purchase period is 30 days following the lead

Young South Africans Buying Fewer Houses

Lightstone data reveals that buyers under 35 are buying fewer but more expensive houses. Purchases by those aged 26–35 fell 25% from 92,558 in 2018 to 69,577 in 2023, a sharper decline than the overall market's 13% drop. The share of under-35 buyers paying R1m–R3m rose from 29% to 36%, while sub-R500k purchases fell from 34% to 25%. First-time buyers account for 70–71% of under-35 purchases.

  • 2018: Purchases by 26–35 age group = 92,558 (31% of total purchases)
  • 2023: Purchases by 26–35 age group = 69,577 (27% of total purchases) — 25% decline
  • 2018: Under-25 purchases = 11,480; 2023: 8,977
  • 2018: Total transfers = 294,859; 2023: 255,726 (13% decline)
  • 2018: 29% of under-35 buyers paid R1m–R3m; 2023: 36%
  • 2018: 34% of under-35 buyers paid R250k–R500k; 2023: 25%
  • 2023–2024: First-time buyers = 70–71% of under-35 market

PayProp Rental Index: Average rent passes R9,000 for the first time

PayProp's Rental Index shows the average South African residential rent passed R9,000 for the first time in Q4 2024 at R9,051, a 5.2% YoY increase (R453). This was the strongest quarter of rental growth since 2017 and the first time rental growth exceeded inflation for a full quarter. Tenants spent 28.7% of income on rent and 44.1% on debt repayments in Q4 2024.

  • Q4 2023: Average rent R8,598/month (4.6% YoY growth)
  • Q4 2024: Average rent R9,051/month (5.2% YoY growth, +R453) — first time above R9,000
  • Q4 2024: Real-terms rental growth reached 2.4% in December (first above-inflation quarter in years)
  • Q4 2024: Tenants in arrears at near-record low of 17.1%
  • Q4 2024: Tenants spent 28.7% of income on rent, 44.1% on debt repayments
  • Q4 2024: Western Cape average rent exceeded R11,000 (10.1% YoY growth)

The cost of being young in South Africa: Gen Z financial hurdles

BizCommunity summarizes The TEFL Academy's "The Cost of Being Young in 2005 vs 2025 in South Africa" report, which draws on Stats SA, National Treasury, the Quarterly Labour Force Survey, and the Household Affordability Index. The study uses inflation-adjusted benchmarks across housing, transport, education, groceries, and debt. It finds youth unemployment at 46% (per QLFS) and salaries losing ~21% in real terms.

  • 2008: More than half of graduate vacancies offered R75,000–R100,000/year (R6,250–R8,333/month); top 20% paid above R175,000/year (R14,583/month) — per Mail & Guardian 2008
  • 2025: Indeed reported average intern salary ~R5,847/month (September 2025); Glassdoor ~R9,000/month (October 2025)
  • 2005: Average monthly rent ~R1,500 (SAPOA / early PayProp estimates), ~20% of graduate income
  • 2024: Average rent R8,598/month (PayProp Rental Index Annual Market Report 2024 Edition), 48–64% of Gen Z income
  • 2005: Average car price R65,000; 2025: R178,800 (175% increase, including insurance)
  • 2005: Public transport fare R561/month; 2025: R850/month (52% increase)
  • 2005: Household food basket ~R1,500; 2025: R5,443 (263% increase)

The average house price is at a record high (BetterBond June 2025 Brief)

The June 2025 BetterBond Property Brief reports the average house price for all buyers reached a record R1.6 million (2.1% YoY, below CPI of 2.8%). First-time buyer prices dropped 0.8% from Q1 2025. Real house prices have declined 4.6%–7% since Q1 2022. The average FTB deposit fell from ~R200,000 a year ago to R169,000, a 14.8% YoY decline.

  • April–May 2025: Average house price R1.6 million (record high, 2.1% YoY)
  • April 2025: CPI 2.8%
  • Q1 2022–Q1 2025: Real house prices declined 4.6%–7%
  • Q1 2022–2025: Debt service costs as % of household income rose from 6.7% to 9.1%, then eased to 8.9%
  • April–May 2025: Average FTB deposit R169,000 (down from ~R200,000 a year prior, 14.8% YoY decline)
  • April–May 2025: Average deposit for all buyers R285,000 (6.7% YoY decline)
  • 12 months to May 2025: Home loan application index 34% lower than four years ago
  • 12 months to May 2025: Share of loans for homes below R500k declined 7.2%; homes above R3m increased 8.4%

The average price of a new vehicle (naamsa / Lightstone 2025 aggregate data)

Aggregated naamsa and Lightstone data shows the average new passenger car price in South Africa settled at ~R370,000 in 2025. Total new vehicle sales reached 596,818 units — the highest in a decade. Vehicle price inflation was only 1.5% in 2025, the lowest since 2008, driven by affordable Chinese and Indian imports. Chinese brands captured 17%+ of passenger vehicle sales.

  • 2025: Average new passenger car price ~R370,000
  • 2025: Average light commercial vehicle price ~R480,000
  • 2025: Total new vehicle sales 596,818 units (decade high, above 2019 pre-pandemic levels)
  • 2025: Vehicle price inflation 1.5% (lowest since 2008)
  • 2025: Chinese brands captured 17%+ of passenger vehicle sales (TransUnion Q4 2025 Mobility Insights)
  • 2025: New car sales growth 15.7% (driven by lower interest rates and affordable imports)

Financial independence slips away for 20-somethings as wages trail inflation by nearly two decades

A report by The TEFL Academy comparing the cost of living for Millennial graduates entering the job market in 2005 with Gen Z graduates in 2025 finds that salaries grew just 8–44% since 2008, far below inflation and GDP growth. Entry-level salaries have lost around 21% of purchasing power, with rent now consuming 48–64% of a young professional's income vs ~20% in 2005.

  • 2008: Graduate roles paid R6,250–R8,333/month; top 20% earned ~R14,583/month
  • 2025: Internships average R6,000–R9,000/month — a nominal increase of just 8–44% over ~17 years
  • 2005: Rent was ~R1,500/month, consuming ~20% of graduate income
  • 2024: Average rent reached R8,598/month (PayProp), consuming 48–64% of Gen Z income
  • 2005: Monthly groceries ~R1,500; 2025: household food basket ~R5,443 (263% increase)
  • 2005: NSFAS average loan R30,000; 2025: R90,000 (200% increase / tripled)
  • 2005: Petrol R5.02/litre; 2025: R21.14/litre (300%+ increase)
  • 2005: Diesel R5.14/litre; 2025: R19.47/litre (~280% increase)

Generational home affordability: why the 20-year-old today is locked out

Using Lightstone data and bond originator figures, this article compares first-time home buying across generations. In 1966 a typical home cost R9,500 and a 20-year-old needed ~R231/month to qualify; today a R1.5 million home requires ~R52,830/month. Despite price-to-income ratios appearing slightly improved (6.9 vs 7.9 years), the absolute income threshold for mortgage qualification has risen dramatically, driven by interest rates.

  • 1966: Typical home cost R9,500; required income ~R2,772/year (~R231/month) at 7.5% prime over 20 years
  • 1966 (inflation-adjusted to today): Equivalent income ~R285,516/year; equivalent monthly repayment ~R7,931
  • 2024: Young adults aged 20–35 accounted for ~30% of all property transactions (Lightstone); 17% paid R1m–R1.5m
  • 2025–2026: At R1.5m home price, 10.25% prime, 20-year bond — required income ~R633,960/year (~R52,830/month); monthly repayment ~R17,610
  • 2024–2025: Median first-time buyer age ~38–40 years vs 23–25 in the 1960s
  • 2026-01: BetterBond average first-time buyer price just above R1.3 million; ooba average price R1.44 million
  • 2025-Q4: BetterBond average FTB deposit R150,000 (15% YoY decline, but still 30% higher than early 2021)
  • 2026-01: Prime lending rate 10.25% after cumulative 150bps cut since Q3 2024; home loan applications up 8.9% YoY

Millennials thought they had it tough, but Gen Z is struggling even more

Drawing on The TEFL Academy report, this article confirms that Gen Z graduates earn R6,000–R9,000/month while rent alone averages R8,598, consuming up to 64% of income vs ~20% for Millennials in 2005. Student debt has tripled from R30,000 to R90,000, and transport costs have surged, making car ownership nearly impossible for young professionals.

  • 2005: Rent ~R1,500/month (~20% of graduate income); 2024: R8,598/month (48–64% of Gen Z income)
  • 2005: Household food basket ~R1,500; 2025: R5,443 (263% increase)
  • 2005: NSFAS loan ~R30,000; 2025: ~R90,000 (200% increase)
  • 2005: Average car price R65,000; 2025: R178,800 (175% increase)
  • 2005: Petrol R5.02/litre, diesel R5.14/litre; 2025: petrol R21.14/litre, diesel R19.47/litre

Point of view: The stark financial reality facing South Africa's youth in 2025

Personal Finance editor Dieketseng Maleke provides a first-person account comparing her 2009 intern salary of R5,000/month (rent R2,000, ~30% of income) with today's Gen Z graduates earning R6,000–R9,000 while rent averages R8,598. She notes food costs rose from R1,500 to R5,443, and entry-level car prices from R65,000 to R178,800, making independent living nearly impossible for young professionals.

  • 2009: Intern salary R5,000/month; rent R2,000/month (~30% of income, could live independently)
  • 2025: Gen Z graduates earn R6,000–R9,000/month; rent averages R8,598 (up to 64% of income)
  • 2009: Food ~R1,500/month; 2025: R5,443 (263% increase)
  • 2009: Public transport ~R561/month; 2025: R850/month
  • 2009: Fuel ~R7.00/litre; 2025: over R21.00/litre
  • 2005/2009: Entry-level car ~R65,000; 2025: R178,800

Stats SA QLFS Q1:2026 — Official Labour Market Presentation

The official Stats SA QLFS Q1 2026 presentation provides the most recent authoritative data on South Africa's labour market, including detailed youth unemployment figures, NEET rates, and a 10-year time series. It shows youth unemployment persistently above 40% and NEET rates climbing for the 15-24 age group.

  • Q1:2026: Youth (15-34) official unemployment rate: 45.8%, with 4.7 million unemployed out of 21.0 million working-age youth
  • Q1:2026: Youth aged 15-24 unemployment rate: 60.9%; aged 25-34: 40.6%
  • Q1:2026: NEET rate for 15-24-year-olds: 37.6% (3.9 million out of 10.3 million)
  • Q1:2026: NEET rate for 15-34-year-olds: 45.6%
  • Q1:2016→Q1:2026: Number of unemployed youth increased from 3.7 million to 4.7 million; long-term unemployment proportion rose from 63.3% to 75.5%
  • Q1:2026: Graduate unemployment rate: 12.2% (up from 10.3% in Q4:2025)
  • Q1:2026: National official unemployment rate: 32.7%; combined rate including potential labour force (LU3): 43.7%
  • Q1:2026: Female NEET rate (15-24): 39.2%, up 1.7 percentage points from Q1:2025

Stats SA QLFS Q4:2025 — Media Release

The Q4 2025 QLFS media release reported a slight decline in the national unemployment rate to 31.4%, with 44,000 jobs added. Youth unemployment remained structurally entrenched despite the overall improvement.

  • Q4:2025: Official national unemployment rate: 31.4% (down from 31.9% in Q3:2025)
  • Q4:2025: Employment increased by 44,000 to 17.1 million; unemployed decreased by 172,000 to 7.8 million

Stats SA — Marginalised Groups Series VII: The Social Profile of the Youth, 2014-2024

Stats SA's Social Profile of the Youth report (released February 2025) provides a decade-long overview of youth marginalisation from 2014 to 2024, documenting rising unemployment, growing social grant dependence, and persistent skills mismatches. It confirms that youth unemployment has worsened over the decade despite policy interventions.

  • 2014→2024: Youth unemployment rate (15-34, official) climbed from 36.8% to 45.5%
  • 2024: Approximately 21 million young people account for 33.1% of the country's population (Mid-year Population Estimates)
  • Q1:2016→Q1:2026: Graduate unemployment doubled from 5.6% to 12.2%
  • Q1:2016→Q1:2026: Total unemployed persons increased from 5.7 million to 8.1 million; employed increased only from 15.6 million to 16.8 million

Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 1068 — South African Youth See Government as Failing on Job Creation

Afrobarometer's Round 10 survey (2025) of South African youth (18-35) found deep pessimism: 84% see the country headed in the "wrong direction," 96% say government is failing to create jobs, and 30% have considered emigrating. Nearly half prefer public-sector employment, and job creation is their top priority for additional government spending.

  • 2025: 84% of youth (18-35) believe South Africa is headed in the "wrong direction"
  • 2025: 47% of youth say they are not employed and looking for work (vs. 38% of 36-55-year-olds)
  • 2025: 96% of youth say government is failing to create jobs; 91% say failing on corruption
  • 2025: 63% of youth cite unemployment as the most important problem for government to address
  • 2025: 45% of youth would prefer to work in government/public sector; only 23% want to start their own business
  • 2025: 30% of youth have considered moving abroad; better job opportunities top the reasons
  • 2014→2024: Unemployment rate among 15-34-year-olds increased from 36.8% to 45.5% (citing Stats SA)
  • 2024: 43.2% of 15-34-year-olds were NEET, up 5 percentage points from a decade earlier
  • 2009→2024: Social grant dependence among 15-24-year-olds grew from 4.8% to 35.9%
  • Q1:2025: 2 million of the country's 3.5 million discouraged work-seekers were youth aged 15-34

Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 681 — South African Youth Say Government Is Failing to Address Their Top Priority: Jobs

Afrobarometer's 2023 survey found unemployment to be the overwhelming top priority for South African youth, with only about 1 in 10 giving government a passing grade on job creation, crime, electricity, or corruption. Youth are more educated than older generations but also more likely to be unemployed.

  • 2023: 54% of youth (18-35) cite unemployment as one of their top three priorities for government
  • 2023: 47% of youth say they are looking for a job (vs. 35% of middle-aged, 10% of older citizens)
  • 2023: Only 11% of youth give government a passing grade on job creation; 10% on corruption
  • 2023: 45% of youth describe their personal living conditions as "fairly bad" or "very bad"
  • Q1:2023: Unemployment among 15-34-year-olds: 46.5% (vs. national average of 32.9%)
  • 2020: South Africa ranked 131st of 181 countries on the Global Youth Development Index

SALDRU/UCT — Youth Unemployment and the Search for Meaningful Pathways to Employment

SALDRU's annual NEET analysis, based on QLFS Q1 data from 2015-2025, shows the NEET rate for 15-24-year-olds rising from 29% to 34% over the decade. Long-term searching unemployment among NEET youth increased from 40% to over 50%, with 67% of NEET youth indicating they want to work and are available to work.

  • Q1:2025: 34% of youth aged 15-24 are NEET, representing over 3.5 million youth
  • 2015→2025: NEET rate (15-24) increased from 29% to 34%
  • 2015→2025: Long-term searching unemployed (1+ year) among NEET youth rose from 40% to over 50%
  • Q1:2025: Over 67% of NEET youth (2,366,610) wanted to work and were available to work
  • Q1:2025: 24.6% of employed youth worked in the informal sector (excluding private households)

SALDRU/UCT — Profile of Young NEETs in South Africa (2022 Annual Update)

This detailed profile of NEET youth aged 15-24, using QLFS data from 2013-2022, found that NEETs are predominantly female, black, slightly older (20-24), urban, and in income poverty. The majority are unemployed (not inactive), with 80.6% being new labour market entrants who have never worked before.

  • Q1:2022: NEET rate for 15-24-year-olds: 34.3% (3.51 million out of 10.23 million)
  • Q1:2013: NEET rate for 15-24-year-olds: 30.2% (3.07 million)
  • Q1:2022: Official unemployment rate among 15-24-year-olds: 63.9%
  • Q1:2022: 49.7% of searching-unemployed NEET youth were long-term unemployed (1+ year)
  • Q1:2022: 80.6% of searching-unemployed NEETs were new entrants who had never worked before
  • 2018: 58.4% of NEET youth (15-24) lived in income poverty (household income <R1,183/person/month)
  • Q1:2022: 88.5% of NEET youth were black African; 50.8% were female

African Youth Survey 2026 — Ichikowitz Family Foundation

The African Youth Survey 2026, covering 4,901 youth aged 18-24 across 16 African countries, found South African youth among the most pessimistic on the continent. Only 23% believe the country is heading in the right direction and 25% feel excited about the future, while 69% believe Africa is moving in the wrong direction — placing South Africa in the bottom three for optimism. This contrasts sharply with the continental average, where 47% say their country is moving in the right direction (up from 30% in 2024).

  • 2026: Only 23% of South African youth believe the country is heading in the right direction
  • 2026: Only 25% of South African youth feel excited about the future
  • 2026: 69% of South African respondents believe Africa is moving in the wrong direction (among the continent's most pessimistic)
  • 2026: South Africa ranked in the bottom three in Africa for youth optimism
  • 2026: Continental average — 47% say their country is moving in the right direction (up from 30% in 2024); 45% say their economy is heading in the right direction (up from 26% in 2024)
  • 2026: 73% of African youth prefer democracy; 56% say Western-style democracy not suited for Africa
  • 2026: Survey interviewed 4,901 youth aged 18-24 across 16 countries in March 2026

Youth Capital — 2025 Q4 QLFS: Youth Unemployment Exposed

Youth Capital's analysis of the Q4 2025 QLFS highlights that while the official youth unemployment rate (15-34) marginally declined from 44.6% to 43.8%, this does not represent recovery. A decade ago youth unemployment stood at 34.9%. For every 5 unemployed young people, 4 have been without work for more than a year, indicating entrenched long-term exclusion.

  • Q4:2024→Q4:2025: Youth unemployment (15-34) declined marginally from 44.6% to 43.8%
  • Q4:2025: Youth unemployment rate for 15-24-year-olds: 57% (highest of any age group)
  • ~2015: Youth unemployment stood at 34.9% a decade prior
  • Q4:2025: For every 5 unemployed young people, 4 have been without work for more than a year

SABC News — Indlulamithi Survey Reveals Generational Divide Over SA's Future

The Indlulamithi Perception Survey 2026 revealed a striking generational divide: respondents under 30 are more hopeful that South Africa is on a path to renewal than their older counterparts. However, the 2026 Barometer found 72% of current indicators point towards continued economic stagnation, describing a country that functions but struggles to create a convincing sense of progress.

  • 2026: Under-30 respondents more optimistic about SA being on a path to renewal than older cohorts
  • 2026: 72% of Barometer indicators point towards continued economic stagnation
  • 2026: Many respondents fear South Africa could slide into deeper institutional failure, including criminal syndicates capturing state institutions

El País English — Gen Z's Struggle in South Africa, the Most Unequal Country in the World

This feature report from Johannesburg profiles Gen Z students at Wits University navigating the extremes of post-apartheid South Africa — between Alexandra township and Sandton's wealth. It contextualises South Africa's status as the world's most unequal country (by Gini coefficient) and the demographic pressures of a young population, with 60% under 34 and youth unemployment at 46%.

  • Q1:2025: Unemployment rate among 15-34-year-olds: 46% (nine points higher than a decade ago)
  • 2026: 60% of South Africa's population is under 34
  • 2026: Richest 10% of the population owns 80% of household wealth (World Bank data)
  • 2021-2022: Approximately 2,400 women murdered (estimated highest rate in the world, per SA Medical Research Council)
  • 2050 (projected): A third of the world's youth will be African (UN projections)

SABC News Analysis — Statistics Reveal Bleak Economic Future for Youth

This comprehensive analysis piece draws on QLFS Q1 2026 data, the Stats SA Social Profile of Youth 2014-2024 report, and the General Household Survey 2025 to paint a detailed picture of youth labour market exclusion. It documents the decade-long deterioration in youth employment outcomes, rising NEET rates, growing gender disparities, and the doubling of graduate unemployment.

  • Q1:2026: 45.8% of youth (15-34) unemployed — 4.7 million without jobs; only 5.6 million employed out of 21 million working-age youth
  • Q1:2026: NEET rate 15-24: 37.6% (3.9 million); NEET rate 15-34: 45.6% — both up 0.5pp from Q1:2025
  • Q1:2016→Q1:2026: Number of unemployed youth increased from 3.7 million to 4.7 million; long-term unemployment proportion from 63.3% to 75.5%
  • Q1:2016→Q1:2026: Graduate unemployment doubled from 5.6% to 12.2%
  • Q1:2026: Absorption rate for 15-24 age group: 10.1% (lowest of any age group); participation rate for 25-34: 72.0% with absorption rate of 42.8%
  • Q1:2026: Female NEET rate (15-24): 39.2% (up 1.7pp from Q1:2025); male NEET: 36.0% (down 0.7pp)
  • 2025 (GHS): Total higher education enrolment increased 59.1% between 2002 and 2025 to 976,147; black African students comprised 73.9% of all students in 2025

Wits University — South Africa's Youth Are a Generation Lost Under Democracy

David Everatt's research traces youth marginalisation from 1992 to 2018 using a multi-dimensional marginalisation index. Comparing the 1992 and 2018 surveys, the proportion of youth who are "fine" dropped from 25% to 16%, while the "lost" category remained at 5%. The study finds that youth today are only marginally better off than when apartheid ended, with a stark racial divide in outcomes.

  • Late 2023: Expanded unemployment rate for 15-24-year-olds: 60.7%; for 25-34: 39.8%
  • 1992→2018: Youth classified as "fine" dropped from 25% to 16%; "lost" remained at 5%
  • 2018: Only 14.1% of African youth classified as "fine" vs. 33.3% of white youth and 34.8% of Indian youth
  • 2018: To be young, black, and male in Gauteng carried the highest likelihood of marginalisation; only 0.3% of white youth showed signs of high marginalisation
  • 2024: Youth (under 34) make up 34.3% of the population

SARB Repo Rate and Prime Rate History (2020–2026)

The SARB repo rate went from 6.25% pre-pandemic to a historic low of 3.50% (prime 7.00%) in July 2020, then was hiked aggressively by 475 bps to 8.25% (prime 11.75%) by May 2023. The cutting cycle began in September 2024, delivering 150 bps of cuts to 6.75% (prime 10.25%) by November 2025. On a R1 million bond over 20 years, the peak prime rate of 11.75% cost ~R10,837/month vs. ~R9,984 at prime 10.50% — a R853 monthly difference.

  • 2020 (January): Repo = 6.25%, Prime = 9.75%
  • 2020 (July): Repo = 3.50%, Prime = 7.00% (historic low, COVID-19 cuts)
  • 2021 (November): First hike — Repo = 3.75%, Prime = 7.25%
  • 2022 (November): Repo = 7.00%, Prime = 10.50% (after three 75 bp hikes)
  • 2023 (May): Repo = 8.25%, Prime = 11.75% (cycle peak)
  • 2024 (September): First cut — Repo = 8.00%, Prime = 11.50%
  • 2025 (November): Repo = 6.75%, Prime = 10.25% (after 150 bps of cuts)
  • 2026 (May): Repo = 7.00%, Prime = 10.50% (rate hiked 25 bp)

FNB House Price Index — Annual and Monthly Data (2001–2025)

FNB's repeat-sales House Price Index provides the longest continuous house price benchmark in South Africa. The full monthly HPI table from 2001 to January 2025 shows the pandemic boom, the post-2022 correction, and the early-2025 recovery. House price growth collapsed from 7.8% y/y in early 2021 to 0.5% y/y by mid-2024, before recovering to 4.7% y/y by November 2025.

  • 2020 (July): FNB HPI at 2.2% y/y (pandemic low point, before stimulus-driven recovery)
  • 2021 (March): FNB HPI at 7.1% y/y (pandemic boom peak approaching)
  • 2023 (August): FNB HPI at 0.8% y/y (near-trough during peak interest rates)
  • 2024 (June): FNB HPI at 0.5% y/y (cycle low)
  • 2024 (annual average): FNB HPI averaged 0.8% for the full year, down from 1.5% in 2023
  • 2025 (January): FNB HPI at 1.2% y/y (highest since June 2023)
  • 2025 (August): FNB HPI at 4.5% y/y (fastest growth in over three years, per FNB Property Barometer August 2025)
  • 2025 (November): FNB HPI at 4.7% y/y (decelerating from 5.0% revised in October)

FNB Estate Agents Survey — First-Time Buyer Participation (4Q 2024)

FNB's 4Q24 Estate Agents Survey shows first-time buyer participation rising from 20% to 25% of total market activity, with a 39% share in the Affordable segment. However, this remains below 2022 levels (~30%), when the interest rate hiking cycle began. The survey also notes a shift away from unsecured credit for deposits toward personal savings, partly driven by the "two-pot" retirement system.

  • 2024 (4Q): First-time buyers = 25% of total market activity (up from 20% in 3Q24)
  • 2024 (4Q): First-time buyers = 39% of Affordable segment market activity
  • 2022 (approx.): First-time buyers = ~30% of total market activity (pre-hiking cycle peak)
  • 2024 (4Q): Buy-to-let purchases increased from 8% to 12% of market activity; 30% of Affordable segment purchases were for investment

ooba oobarometer Q1 2026 — First-Time Buyer Comeback

ooba's Q1 2026 data shows first-time homebuyers accounted for 48% of all applications (up from 46.5% a year earlier), with application volumes up 15.9% and values up 30.4% from the Q4 2023 low. The overall approval rate was 84%, with average deposits at 12.8% of purchase price for all buyers and 8.2% for first-time buyers — down from 9.6% a year earlier. Zero-deposit (100%) home loans reached 60.2% of first-time buyer applications, and cost-inclusive loans grew from 0.49% (2016) to nearly 16% (early 2026).

  • 2026 (Q1): First-time buyers = 48% of all ooba applications (up from 46.5% in Q1 2025)
  • 2026 (Q1): Average deposit for all buyers = 12.8% of purchase price (R221,937), down from 15.4% a year earlier
  • 2026 (Q1): Average first-time buyer deposit = 8.2% (R103,842), down from 9.6% in Q1 2025
  • 2026 (Q1): Overall approval rate = 84%; 45.5% of applications declined by one bank but approved by another
  • 2026 (Q1): 100% (zero-deposit) home loans = 60.2% of first-time buyer applications
  • 2016: Cost-inclusive home loans = 0.49% of first-time buyer applications
  • 2026 (Q1): Cost-inclusive home loans = ~16% of first-time buyer applications
  • 2026 (Q1): Average purchase price growth = 4.7% y/y; first-time buyer price growth = 1.5% y/y

ooba Q2 2025 Data — Deposit Trends and Affordability

ooba's Q2 2025 oobarometer shows application volumes up 11% y/y and total application values up 18.5%. The average property purchase price was R1,695,257 (up 3.9% y/y), with the average homebuyer now aged 40. First-time buyers averaged age 35, spending R1,239,413 (up 3.5% y/y). Deposits drifted lower to R239,545 (14.1% of purchase price). 59% of first-time buyers purchased with zero deposit, and 10.5% secured cost-inclusive financing. The approval rate for 100%+ LTV loans was 80.8%.

  • 2025 (Q2): Average property purchase price = R1,695,257 (up 3.9% y/y)
  • 2025 (Q2): Average homebuyer age = 40 (one year older y/y)
  • 2025 (Q2): Average first-time buyer age = 35 (unchanged y/y)
  • 2025 (Q2): Average first-time buyer purchase price = R1,239,413 (up 3.5% y/y)
  • 2025 (Q2): Average deposit = R239,545 (14.1% of purchase price, down 13.5% y/y)
  • 2025 (Q2): 59% of first-time buyers used zero-deposit (100%) home loans
  • 2025 (Q2): Approval rate for 100%+ LTV loans = 80.8% (down from 81.7% in Q2 2024)
  • 2025 (Q2): Western Cape average deposit = 20.3% of purchase price (highest); Mpumalanga = 7.9% (lowest)

ooba Q3 2024 Data — Early Resurgence in First-Time Homebuyers

ooba's Q3 2024 data captures the first response to interest rate cuts, with first-time buyers accounting for 48% of quarterly applications (51% in September alone). The average first-time buyer purchase price was R1,155,056 (up 3.4% y/y), with deposits declining 2.9% y/y to R114,161 (9.9% of the average loan). Zero-deposit bonds had tapered from 67.5% (June 2020) to 54.7%. Pre-qualified first-time buyers had a 90.5% approval rate vs. 74.5% for non-pre-qualified.

  • 2024 (Q3): First-time buyers = 48% of ooba applications (51% in September 2024 alone)
  • 2024 (Q3): Average first-time buyer purchase price = R1,155,056 (up 3.4% y/y)
  • 2024 (Q3): Average first-time buyer deposit = R114,161 (9.9% of average loan, down 2.9% y/y)
  • 2020 (June): Zero-deposit (100%) bond applications = 67.5% of first-time buyer applications
  • 2024 (Q3): Zero-deposit bond applications = 54.7% of first-time buyer applications
  • 2024 (Q3): Pre-qualified first-time buyer approval rate = 90.5%; non-pre-qualified = 74.5%
  • 2024 (Q3): Overall approval rate = 82.8% (marginally down 0.5% y/y)

Lightstone — Profile of Young Buyers Change but Numbers Fall

Over 20 years, black buyers under-35 have more than doubled while white under-35 buyers dropped by a third. Despite this demographic shift, under-35s made up just 7% of property owners in 2025 despite accounting for 37% of the population. Property owners over-50 held 68% of properties while making up 29% of the population. Lightstone's MD noted the affordable housing gap and title deeds backlog as structural barriers.

  • 2025: Under-35s = 7% of property owners but 37% of population
  • 2025: Over-50s = 68% of properties owned but 29% of population
  • 2005–2025: Black under-35 buyers more than doubled; white under-35 buyers dropped by a third
  • 2025: By current trends, black under-35 buyers will shortly outnumber white under-35 buyers

Lightstone — Less Homes Sold, and Buyers Are Older

Lightstone's long-run analysis shows under-35 buyers dropped from 47% of transactions (2000) to 30% (2025). In absolute terms, under-35 buyers fell from 80,000+ (2000) to 53,000 (2024). Buyers aged 35-60 increased from ~50% (2000) to 70% (2025) of transactions, and over-60s doubled their share. Under-35 buyers now pay 20% less than the 35-60 benchmark (vs. 12% less in 2000), while over-60s pay a 15% premium.

  • 2000: Under-35 buyers = ~47% of transactions (~80,000+ transactions)
  • 2024: Under-35 buyers = ~30% of transactions (~53,000 transactions)
  • 2000: Under-35 buyers paid 12% less than 35-60 benchmark
  • 2025: Under-35 buyers paid 20% less than 35-60 benchmark
  • 2000: Over-60 buyers = ~minority share; 2025: Over-60 buyers doubled their share over 25 years
  • 2025: 35-60 year-olds = ~70% of transactions (up from ~50% in 2000)

BetterBond Property Brief October 2025 — Record Prices, Declining Deposits

BetterBond's October 2025 brief shows home loan applications up 14.6% y/y (highest since early 2022), with average home prices at a record R1.6 million and first-time buyer prices at R1.3 million. First-time buyer deposits are 15% below the prior year's peak. Average household income for homebuyers reached R95,000 in September 2025, up 9% y/y. Over six years, average home prices have climbed 10.7%.

  • 2025 (Q3): BetterBond home loan applications up 14.6% y/y and 11.6% q/q (highest since early 2022)
  • 2025 (October): Average home purchase price = R1.6 million (record high)
  • 2025 (October): Average first-time buyer price = R1.3 million (record high)
  • 2025: First-time buyer deposits = 15% below prior year's peak
  • 2025 (September): Average household income (homebuyers) = R95,000 (up 9% y/y)
  • 2019–2025 (six years): Average home prices climbed 10.7%

BetterBond Property Brief December 2025 — Deposit Decline Accelerates

BetterBond's December 2025 brief shows home loan applications up 23.5% since Q3 2023, with the index 16% higher y/y. First-time buyer deposits dropped 20% y/y and 13% q/q. Average home prices remain stable at R1.63 million, while first-time buyer prices dipped slightly to R1.3 million. The 150 bps of cumulative rate cuts since September 2024 is cited as the key driver of improved affordability.

  • 2025 (December): Home loan applications up 23.5% since Q3 2023; index up 16% y/y
  • 2025 (Q4): First-time buyer deposits down 20% y/y and 13% q/q
  • 2025 (Q4): Average home price = R1.63 million (stable); first-time buyer price = R1.3 million (slight q/q decline)
  • 2024 (September)–2025: SARB delivered 150 basis points of cumulative rate cuts

BetterBond Property Brief May 2025 — Deposit and Regional Data

BetterBond's May 2025 brief shows the home loan application index up 2.2% y/y (12 months to April 2025), recovering from a 15% decline a year earlier. Average home price was R1.6 million, with first-time buyer prices at R1.28 million. The average first-time buyer deposit dropped nearly 9% y/y to R175,000. The Eastern Cape led approval ratios at 83.9%. Building activity diverged sharply: Western Cape residential completions up 24%, Gauteng down 30%.

  • 2025 (April, 12 months to): BetterBond home loan application index up 2.2% y/y (recovering from -15% a year earlier)
  • 2025 (April): Average home purchase price = R1.6 million; first-time buyer price = R1.28 million
  • 2025 (April): Average first-time buyer deposit = R175,000 (down ~9% y/y)
  • 2025: Eastern Cape approval ratio = 83.9% (highest nationally)
  • 2025: Western Cape residential completions up 24%; Gauteng down 30%

BetterBond / Daily News — First-Time Buyer Age Soars to 37

BetterBond's national head of sales Bradd Bendall confirmed the average first-time buyer age rose to 37 from 33 a few years prior. The article cites that only 15.8% of South Africans' take-home pay is sufficient to afford a R1.3 million property. Absa reported first-time buyers contributed more than half of their 2024 application volume, with solo female buyers making up about half of total applications. Properties under R1 million accounted for ~42% of BetterBond's bonds processed.

  • 2025 (April): Average first-time buyer age = 37 (up from 33 a few years prior)
  • 2025: Only 15.8% of South Africans' take-home pay sufficient to afford a R1.3 million property
  • 2024: First-time buyers = more than 50% of Absa Home Loans application volume (per Nondumiso Ncapai, Absa)
  • 2024: Solo female buyers = ~50% of Absa total applications
  • 2025: Properties under R1 million = ~42% of BetterBond bonds processed

Generational Home Affordability — 1966 vs 2025

A generational comparison shows in 1966 a typical home cost R9,500, requiring ~R231/month income at 7.5% prime. In 2024-2025, a R1.5 million home at 10.25% prime requires ~R52,830/month income (R633,960/year) — more than double the inflation-adjusted 1966 equivalent of R7,931/month. BetterBond's January 2026 data shows first-time buyer prices at R1.3 million with average deposits of R150,000 (down 15% y/y but still 30% above early-2021 levels). The median first-time buyer age is now 38-40 (vs. 23-25 in the 1960s).

  • 1966: Typical home cost = R9,500; required income = ~R231/month at 7.5% prime
  • 1966 (inflation-adjusted to 2025): Equivalent income = ~R285,516/year; equivalent monthly repayment = ~R7,931
  • 2024-2025: R1.5 million home at 10.25% prime requires ~R52,830/month income (R633,960/year)
  • 2024: Young adults aged 20-35 accounted for ~30% of all property transactions (Lightstone); 17% paid R1m-R1.5m
  • 2026 (January): BetterBond first-time buyer average price = ~R1.3 million (record)
  • 2026 (January, Q4 2025): Average first-time buyer deposit = R150,000 (down 5.6% q/q, down 15% y/y)
  • 2021 (early) vs 2025: Average first-time buyer deposit still 30% above early-2021 levels
  • 1960s: Average first-time buyer age = 23-25; 2024-2025: Median first-time buyer age = 38-40

IOL / Cape Times — SA Youth Enters Housing Market Under Mounting Financial Pressure

TransUnion SA's Q1 2026 Consumer Pulse Study shows younger consumers remain credit-active but face a slower transition from credit participation to asset ownership. Barriers have shifted from cyclical to structural — driven by affordability constraints, tighter lending conditions, and slower income growth. According to industry data cited by the National Debt Counsellors, 72% of Gen Z South Africans have no credit history, and under-24s make up just 0.5% of the credit market.

  • 2026 (Q1): TransUnion CPS shows many consumers expect difficulty meeting financial obligations
  • 2026: 72% of Gen Z South Africans have no credit history (per National Debt Counsellors / industry data)
  • 2026: Under-24s = 0.5% of South Africa's credit market
  • 2011 (approx., 15 years prior): Barriers were cyclical; 2026: Barriers are structural

IOL Business Report — Demand Outstrips Supply, Under-35s Struggle

SA Corporate Real Estate CEO Rory Mackey cited data showing the first-time buyer age rose to 37 (from 33), and the average age of the first affordable residential property purchase increased to 44 in 2025 (from 35 in 2015). About 40% of new home loan enquiries come from under-35s, but few convert to purchases. NHBRC enrolments for non-subsidy and subsidy housing remain 21% and 29% below pre-Covid levels respectively, indicating sluggish new supply.

  • 2025: First-time buyer age = 37 (up from 33 a few years prior)
  • 2015: Average age of first affordable residential property purchase = 35
  • 2025: Average age of first affordable residential property purchase = 44
  • 2025: ~40% of new home loan enquiries from under-35s, but few convert to purchases
  • 2025: NHBRC non-subsidy enrolments = 21% below pre-Covid levels
  • 2025: NHBRC subsidy enrolments = 29% below pre-Covid levels
  • 2025: Average homebuyer age in the US = 40 (up from 33 five years ago)

Black Tax and Coloniality — Re-interpretation, Emancipation, and Alienation

Annalena Oppel (LSE) analyses 26 essays by South Africans on black tax, combining coloniality theory with the concept of omnivorousness to explore the tension between Ubuntu (mutual care) and individual economic pressure. The study frames black tax as a form of cultural re-interpretation of Ubuntu that can function as both emancipation and alienation, highlighting the internal conflict when navigating between African communal values and Western individualist economic norms within family relationships.

  • 2023: Analysis of 26 essays by South Africans on black tax, identifying three domains of navigation: 'the traditional', 'the modern', and 'the navigation across'
  • 2023: The study proposes that contemporary political stances on capitalism and socialism remain colonial, overlooking moral theories and philosophies from the global South

Black Tax: An International Exploratory Study in the South African Context

Carpenter and Phaswana (UCT) conduct an exploratory study comparing black tax in South Africa with similar family support obligations in other African and diaspora contexts. The study examines how the phenomenon manifests across different cultural and economic settings, identifying common patterns of financial obligation and the tensions between communal responsibility and individual wealth-building. With 35 citations, it is one of the more widely referenced academic studies on black tax.

  • 2021: Exploratory comparative study identifying black tax as an internationally recognisable phenomenon with SA-specific racial and historical dimensions (qualitative findings, no aggregate percentages reported in abstract)

Media Framing of 'Black Tax' in South Africa

Boima and Oyedemi (University of Limpopo) examine how South African media frames black tax, drawing on discourses of African communalism and media framing theory. The study analyses media narratives to identify contesting contexts — between ubuntu as cultural practice and black tax as financial burden — and how media representations shape public understanding of the phenomenon. Keywords include Black Tax, Youth, Apartheid, Deconstruction, Media framing, South Africa, and African Communalism. *(Verified via search metadata and abstract; full text not accessible.)*

  • 2024: Study analyses media framing of black tax in South African texts, identifying tensions between African communalism (ubuntu) and individual financial burden narratives
  • 2024: The study contextualises black tax within apartheid history and its ongoing socio-economic consequences for young Black South Africans

Studying to Support? Exploring Remittance Responsibilities Among Black South African Graduates

Whitelaw, Branson, and Leibbrandt (UCT/SALDRU) extend the 2020 SALDRU working paper into a peer-reviewed journal article, further exploring how Black South African graduates face unique remittance responsibilities tied to their educational attainment. The study examines the intersection of intergenerational education disadvantage, labour market returns to tertiary qualifications, and the obligations graduates face to financially support family networks — arguing that these responsibilities can manifest as an intergenerational transmission of social inequality when they hamper individual wealth accumulation. *(Verified via search metadata and abstract; full text not accessible.)*

  • 2026: Published in Journal of International Development vol. 38, issue 5, p. 868 — extends NIDS-based findings on graduate remittance responsibilities to peer-reviewed format
  • 2026: Finds that private transfers can hamper individuals' own wealth accumulation, manifesting as an intergenerational transmission of social inequality (from abstract)

Private Transfers and Graduate Responsibilities: Evidence from the National Income Dynamics Study

Using NIDS Wave 5 data, Whitelaw and Branson quantitatively analyse private transfer behaviour among Black South Africans, finding that graduates face a differential responsibility to remit that persists even after controlling for income and household structure. The study rejects a unitary household model, showing remittance decisions are driven by individual characteristics — particularly graduate status — not just pooled household resources. This is the first quantitative study to frame black tax through NIDS data.

  • 2017 (NIDS Wave 5): 20.5% of Black households send inter-household remittances
  • 2017: 30% of Black graduates remit, versus 13% of other Black individuals — graduates are roughly double their population share among remitters
  • 2017: Graduates are 9 percentage points more likely to remit than non-graduates, after controlling for labour market income and household structure
  • 2017: Graduate remitters earn on average R11,918.59/month in labour market income vs R8,079.16 for other remitters
  • 2017: For every additional R100 earned, roughly R12–R14 more is remitted; but the income-remittance relationship is weaker for graduates, suggesting a responsibility beyond income alone
  • 2017: 40% of graduate remitters send to parents, vs 28% of other remitters; 46% of graduate remitters are women vs 30% of other remitters

Black Tax: Do Graduates Face Higher Remittance Responsibilities? (Siyaphambili Briefing)

This accessible briefing presents the same NIDS Wave 5 analysis in summary form, with additional findings on intra-household transfers for children's education. It finds that 81% of children in Black households receive private support for education, and that graduates living in households with children significantly increase the probability of those children receiving educational support — including from non-parent graduates. The briefing argues that if a graduate tax were introduced to fund post-secondary education, Black graduates' incomes would effectively be taxed twice.

  • 2017: 81% of children in Black households (aged 6–16, enrolled in school) receive private support for education expenses
  • 2017: 58% of children residing with a graduate receive education support from that graduate; 16% receive support from a graduate who is not their parent
  • 2017: Only 10% of Black individuals hold a high-value (post-secondary) qualification; poverty is a daily threat for 76% of South Africans

'Black tax': Participation in, and Attitudes Towards Intra-Familial Financial Support (Briefing Report 10)

Commissioned by the FSCA and conducted by HSRC's Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES) unit, this briefing report surveys participation in and attitudes towards black tax among South African adults. Authored by Gordon, Roberts, Struwig, Clarke, and Laubscher, it is one of the few nationally representative survey-based studies specifically focused on the prevalence and social attitudes around black tax. The Africa Global Forum's 2026 report cites its finding that approximately 70% of working Black South Africans experience or expect the black tax.

  • 2022: ~70% of working Black South Africans experience or expect the black tax (as cited by AGF 2026, attributing the figure to this HSRC/FSCA survey)
  • 2022: 44% of households support multiple generations (as cited by AGF 2026, attributing to this survey instrument)

The Black Tax Ledger — What Supporting Home Actually Costs a Sender, Over a Working Life

This report combines IFAD remittance data, South African survey/NIDS figures, and original arithmetic to quantify the lifetime cost of black tax for diaspora senders. It includes a dedicated section on South Africa ("The Country That Named It"), arguing the domestic black tax is an analogue of the cross-border diaspora version, both rooted in unfunded state functions performed by private citizens. The report's central worked example: $250/month over 30 years costs $90,000 in cash but ~$305,000 in foregone compounding at 7%.

  • 2025: African remittance flows reached ~$124 billion, roughly double all official development aid to the continent (IFAD data)
  • 2026: ~70% of working Black South Africans experience or expect the black tax; 44% of households support multiple generations; Black households carry more members per income than white ones on identical salaries (SA survey/NIDS figures)
  • 2026: $250/month sent over a 30-year working life = $90,000 in cash and ~$305,000 if compounded at 7% — a ~$215,000 gap in foregone compounding (illustrative, not a prediction)
  • 2025: Average remittance cost to sub-Saharan Africa is 8.78%, making it the most expensive remittance destination on earth (against a 3% UN target)
  • 2026: Sub-Saharan African workers in Europe carry a 26.1% earnings gap, nearly three times the European-arrival gap, before any transfer is sent

Towards an Understanding of 'Black Tax' and the Black Missing Middle (Triple Jeopardy Study)

The Wits School of Governance's Triple Jeopardy study surveyed 100 black South Africans aged 19–36 on race, class, and gender dynamics, with a prominent focus on black tax. It finds that 58% of respondents send remittances home, even though 32% are never or often unable to meet their own monthly obligations. The study argues that black tax does "the real work of income redistribution" in South Africa and that most black middle-class households remain connected to working-class households.

  • 2019: 58% of surveyed black middle-class respondents (aged 19–36) send remittances home to family
  • 2019: 32% of respondents are never or often unable to meet their own monthly obligations
  • 2019: 47% of respondents' parents are not middle class; 44% of siblings are not; 69% of extended family are not
  • 2019: The black middle class has doubled in size over the past 25 years; Stats SA's 2015 upper-income poverty line was R992/month

The Influence of Black Tax on Career Decision Making

Kgaugelo Moleleki's GIBS MBA thesis uses semi-structured interviews (data saturation at 11 participants) with young Black professionals across income backgrounds and career stages to examine how black tax shapes career decisions. The study finds that black tax leads many to prioritise financial stability over career fulfilment, resulting in skill mismatches, reduced professional growth, and psychological strain. Participants from lower socio-economic backgrounds made career sacrifices early, while middle-class participants deferred aspirations like entrepreneurship or working abroad.

  • 2024: Data saturation reached after 11 interviews; study finds black tax drives career compromises with 8 coded instances, growth barriers/limitations with 10 coded instances
  • 2024: Lower socio-economic participants in early/mid-career reported highest career compromise — e.g., taking call centre jobs instead of engineering, teaching instead of psychology, banking instead of professional soccer
  • 2024: Middle-class participants deferred high-risk/high-growth options (entrepreneurship, relocation abroad) due to family commitments; senior-career participants reported finding balance after achieving financial stability

Black Tax: What to Look Out For (Old Mutual Savings & Investment Monitor findings)

John Manyike, head of financial education at Old Mutual, presents OMSIM findings showing that black tax is one of the biggest causes of financial distress among South Africa's middle class. The article reports OMSIM 2018 data on the prevalence of support for older family members, with black respondents significantly more likely to foresee supporting extended family than the general working population.

  • 2018: 72% of working metro South Africans support or foresee supporting older family members (up from 70% in 2017)
  • 2018: 83% of black respondents foresee supporting older family members in the future (up from 79% in 2017)
  • 2018: Nearly 1 in 5 black working metro South Africans regularly support at least one sibling (in addition to parents and own children)

Funding the Family: Black Tax and the 'Sandwich Generation' Are on the Rise

This article reports Old Mutual Savings & Investment Monitor (OMSIM) 2023 data showing the sandwich generation — adults supporting both children and aging parents — increased to 43% of working South Africans. It frames black tax as a responsibility inherited from parents due to their inability to participate in the economy during apartheid, and links the rising trend to SA's unemployment crisis.

  • 2023: Sandwich generation (supporting multiple generations) increased to 43% of working South Africans, up from 39% in 2022 (Old Mutual OMSIM 2023)
  • 2023: 50% of respondents support adult dependents; 79% support children (Old Mutual OMSIM 2023)
  • 2024-Q1: SA unemployment at 32.9%, up from 32.1% in the previous quarter (Stats SA)

Old Mutual Savings & Investment Monitor: South Africans Digging Deeper into Debt

Daily Maverick reports on the 2023 OMSIM survey of ~1,500 employed South Africans (personal income R8,000–R100,000/month), finding that 70% have not seen income improvement since 2020 and 45% are considerably financially stressed. The report contextualises the squeeze that makes black tax payments harder to sustain alongside personal financial goals.

  • 2023: 70% of working South Africans have not seen any income improvement since 2020 (OMSIM 2023)
  • 2023: 45% of respondents are considerably financially stressed; 30% have savings lasting one month or less
  • 2023: Confidence in the SA economy fell from 56% (2015) to 27% (2023) — the lowest level recorded in an OMSIM survey
  • 2023: Stokvel usage among black working South Africans dropped from 53% (2022) to 48% (2023)

'You Feel Obligated': African Workers on the Pain — and Pride — of the 'Black Tax'

This Guardian feature spans Kenya, Zimbabwe, South Africa, and West Africa, profiling workers who send money home. It reports that in South Africa, where unemployment is above 42%, one wage supports almost four people, and references official data showing the average white household income was almost five times that of the average black household in 2023. A South African marketing executive describes the pressure to overcompensate early in her career to build wealth for the next generation.

  • 2026-01: In South Africa, one wage supports almost four people (Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice & Dignity Group)
  • 2026-01: SA unemployment above 42%; average white household income almost 5x average black household income (2023 official data)
  • 2025: Salaried workers surveyed in Lagos, Nigeria reported an average of 20% of monthly wages going to supporting relatives
  • 2022: Remittances from Africans outside the continent totalled $100 billion, more than aid or foreign investment (African Development Bank)

Understanding the Impact of 'Black Tax' on South African Families

This IOL personal finance article reports that 44% of SA households support multiple generations, with one income often supporting up to four people. It notes the legal dimension: under the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998, South African courts can order sibling maintenance as a last resort when no closer relatives can support an indigent family member — highlighting how deeply embedded the expectation of family support is, extending beyond social norm into legal obligation.

  • 2026: 44% of SA households support multiple generations, with one income often supporting up to four people
  • 1998: Maintenance Act 99 of 1998 allows courts to order sibling maintenance as a last resort when parents, grandparents, and children cannot support an indigent family member

'Black Tax' Isn't a Tax. Advice to Stop Paying It Misses the Point

Malilimalo Phaswana, a researcher at UCT, draws on his qualitative study of familial financial support among Xhosa families in Cape Town to argue that the "tax" framing captures only half the story. He finds that the boundaries of "immediate family" in African family structures are broader than assumed in conventional personal finance, that women carry a disproportionately heavier load, and that many participants want supported relatives to eventually achieve financial independence — distinguishing between investing in a sibling's education and sustaining open-ended dependency.

  • 2026-09: Qualitative finding — women carry a greater black tax load than men with similar familial obligations, intertwined with maternal and caregiving roles
  • 2026-09: Participant quote: "We have resigned ourselves to the idea that we will not accumulate any significant wealth until our siblings leave school and find work"

Stats SA Quarterly Labour Force Survey — Q4 2025

Stats SA's QLFS for Q4 2025 shows the official unemployment rate decreased by 0.5pp to 31.4%, with 17.1 million employed and 7.8 million unemployed. Discouraged job-seekers increased by 233,000 to 3.7 million.

  • 2025-Q4: Official unemployment rate 31.4% (down from 31.9% in Q3 2025)
  • 2025-Q4: Employed persons 17.1 million (increase of 44,000 from Q3 2025)
  • 2025-Q4: Discouraged job-seekers 3.7 million (increase of 233,000 from Q3 2025)
  • 2025-Q4: Labour underutilisation (LU4) 44.5%

Stats SA Quarterly Labour Force Survey — Q1 2025 (Youth)

The Q1 2025 QLFS shows the official unemployment rate rose to 32.9%, with youth (15–34) unemployment climbing to 46.1%. Total unemployed youth reached 4.8 million while employed youth fell to 5.7 million.

  • 2025-Q1: Official unemployment rate 32.9% (up 1.0pp from 31.9% in Q4 2024)
  • 2025-Q1: Youth (15–34) unemployment rate 46.1% (up from 44.6% in Q4 2024)
  • 2025-Q1: Total unemployed youth 4.8 million (increase of 151,000 from Q4 2024)
  • 2025-Q1: Employed youth 5.7 million (decrease of 153,000 from Q4 2024)
  • 2025-Q1: Expanded unemployment rate 43.1%

Stats SA Quarterly Labour Force Survey — Q4 2023 (Youth)

The Q4 2023 QLFS recorded youth unemployment at 44.3%, with 4.7 million unemployed youth and 5.9 million employed youth. The overall unemployment rate was 32.1%.

  • 2023-Q4: Official unemployment rate 32.1% (up 0.2pp from 31.9% in Q3 2023)
  • 2023-Q4: Youth (15–34) unemployment rate 44.3% (up from 43.4% in Q3 2023)
  • 2023-Q4: Total unemployed youth 4.7 million (increase of 87,000)
  • 2023-Q4: Employed youth 5.9 million (decrease of 97,000)
  • 2024-Q4: Youth unemployment rate 44.6% (eased from 45.5% in Q3 2024) — per IOL reporting of Stats SA release

SARB Repo Rate History

The SARB repo rate was cut from 6.25% to 3.50% in July 2020 (COVID-19 emergency easing), then raised to 8.25% by May 2023, and has been gradually cut since September 2024 to 7.00% as of May 2026.

  • 2020-07: Repo rate 3.50% (multi-decade low, COVID-19 easing)
  • 2023-01: Repo rate 7.25%
  • 2023-05: Repo rate 8.25% (peak)
  • 2024-09: Repo rate 8.00% (first cut of easing cycle)
  • 2024-11: Repo rate 7.75%
  • 2025-01: Repo rate 7.50%
  • 2025-05: Repo rate 7.25%
  • 2025-07: Repo rate 7.00%
  • 2025-11: Repo rate 6.75%
  • 2026-05: Repo rate 7.00% (latest)

National Treasury Budget Review 2026 — Consolidated Spending Plans

The 2026 Budget Review allocates 23.2% of consolidated spending to education over the MTEF, with basic education at R330.6 billion and higher education at R72.1 billion in 2026/27. The social wage constitutes 60.2% of non-interest spending.

  • 2025/26: Consolidated government expenditure R2.58 trillion
  • 2026/27: Basic education spending R330.6 billion
  • 2026/27: Higher education and training spending R72.1 billion
  • 2026/27: Social protection spending R334.6 billion
  • 2026/27: Social wage 60.2% of non-interest spending
  • 2026/27: Education 23.2% of consolidated expenditure over MTEF
  • 2026/27: 13.6 million schoolchildren supported; 26.5 million social grant beneficiaries
  • 2028/29: Consolidated government expenditure projected R2.89 trillion

World Bank Gini Index — South Africa Time Series

South Africa's Gini index was 63.0 in 2014, the most recent World Bank estimate available on the standard series, making it one of the most unequal countries globally. The index peaked at 64.8 in 2005 and hit a low of 57.8 in 2000.

  • 1993: Gini index 59.30
  • 2000: Gini index 57.80 (lowest recorded)
  • 2005: Gini index 64.80 (highest recorded)
  • 2008: Gini index 63.00
  • 2010: Gini index 63.40
  • 2014: Gini index 63.00 (most recent on World Bank income series)
  • 2022: Gini index 54.1 (FRED/St. Louis Fed, likely consumption-based measure — different methodology)

National Minimum Wage — South Africa

The national minimum wage was raised to R30.23 per hour effective March 2026, up from R28.79 in 2025 and R27.58 in 2024. The 2026 increase represents approximately 5% year-on-year.

  • 2024-03-01: National minimum wage R27.58/hour (8.5% increase)
  • 2025-03-01: National minimum wage R28.79/hour
  • 2026-03-01: National minimum wage R30.23/hour (~5% increase)

SARB Quarterly Bulletin — Household Saving Rate

The SARB's latest quarterly bulletin shows the national saving rate rose to 14.9% of GDP in Q1 2026 from 13.3% in Q4 2025, though analysts expect it to dip in Q2 2026 as rising living costs take their toll.

  • 2025-Q4: National saving rate 13.3% of GDP
  • 2026-Q1: National saving rate 14.9% of GDP

SAJEMS: Predicting the Career Success of Generation Z Employees

A quantitative study of 320 Gen Z SETA bursary holders (W&RSETA and CHIETA) finds no significant relationship between socioeconomic status and career success (adaptability, employability) or proactive career behaviours (engagement, mentorship). Career engagement and mentorship were significantly related to career adaptability and employability, but socioeconomic status did not mediate these relationships.

  • 2024: Study sample N=320 Gen Z SETA bursary holders
  • 2024: Most participants were at a socioeconomic disadvantage during formation years
  • 2024: No significant relationship found between socioeconomic status and career adaptability (p=0.097)
  • 2024: No significant relationship found between socioeconomic status and career engagement (p=0.426)
  • 2024: Career engagement significantly predicted career adaptability (β=0.41, p<0.001)
  • 2024: Career adaptability scale reliability α=0.94; employability scale reliability α=0.84
  • 2024: Conclusion — Gen Z career development from marginalised backgrounds requires comprehensive strategy tackling educational, social and institutional obstacles

PMBEJD Household Affordability Index — Food Basket Time Series

The PMBEJD tracks prices of 44 basic foods from 47 supermarkets and 32 butcheries across Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town, Pietermaritzburg, Mtubatuba, and Springbok. The household food basket cost has risen from R5,238 in December 2023 to R5,452 in April 2026, with year-on-year increases generally moderate.

  • 2023-12: Average household food basket R5,238.20
  • 2023-10: Average household food basket R5,297.58
  • 2024-10: Average household food basket R5,348.65 (+1.0% YoY)
  • 2024-12: Average household food basket R5,383.38 (+2.8% YoY)
  • 2025-01: Average household food basket R5,433.70
  • 2025-12: Average household food basket R5,333.45
  • 2026-01: Average household food basket R5,401.44 (-0.6% YoY)
  • 2026-03: Average household food basket R5,328.53
  • 2026-04: Average household food basket R5,452.09 (+0.6% YoY, +2.3% MoM)

Old Mutual Savings & Investment Monitor 2026 (Gen Z Preview)

Old Mutual's Savings & Investment Monitor preview finds that only 46% of working Gen Z (18–29) save regularly, down 11% from 2025, as rising living costs and family responsibilities erode savings capacity. The national saving rate ticked up to 14.9% of GDP in Q1 2026 but is expected to dip.

  • 2026: 91% of working Gen Z have savings goals
  • 2026: 46% of Gen Z save regularly (down 11% from 2025)
  • 2026: 56% dipped into savings for daily expenses (up 10% from 2025)
  • 2026: 36% of Gen Z report financial stress (up from 29% in 2025)
  • 2026: 22% took out loans for everyday expenses
  • 2026: 43% of Gen Z are "sandwich generation" (supporting both younger and older family)
  • 2026: 51% earning more than a year ago (down from 55% in 2025)
  • 2026-Q1: National saving rate 14.9% of GDP (up from 13.3% in Q4 2025)
  • 2025-02: SARS approved R79.3 billion for two-pot savings withdrawal; 5.6 million tax directives
  • 2023/24: Only ~6% of South Africans on track to retire comfortably (10X Investments)

Standard Bank Youth Barometer 2026

The second edition of Standard Bank's Youth Barometer draws on spending, saving, and borrowing data from Standard Bank and Liberty customers under 35. It finds youth are adapting financially rather than disengaging — buying homes, using credit strategically, and shifting toward value-driven vehicle purchases, particularly Chinese brands.

  • 2023–2026: Under-35s consistently ~40% of all Standard Bank home loan applications received; 40.1% of approved applications
  • 2026: Average granted home loan for under-35s ~R1.2 million (13% increase from 2023)
  • 2021: Chinese-brand share of under-35 vehicle originations 3.1%
  • 2025: Chinese-brand share of under-35 vehicle originations 11.0%
  • 2026-04: Chinese brands 16.7% of all Standard Bank VAF originations (third-largest manufacturer country)
  • 2021–2025: Entry-level vehicle segment growth 339%
  • 2021–2026: Used vehicles 70.5% of under-35 originations (vs 64.1% for 35+); average financed used value ~R287,000, new ~R365,000
  • 2025: Under-35 virtual card adoption ~30% (vs 13% for over-60s)
  • 2025: Under-35 credit card utilisation 70–73% (vs 47% for over-60s)
  • 2025: Under-35s represent 16% of credit card customers but 29% of digital wallet usage
  • 2025: 67.9% of youth financing Chinese-brand cars buy new vehicles (vs 29.5% for other brands)

GCRO: Highest Educational Attainment and Social Mobility Over Time

Using seven iterations of the GCRO Quality of Life survey (N=118,885), this vignette analyses educational attainment across birth cohorts in Gauteng. It finds that tertiary attainment increased from 25% (born before 1950) to 33% (born after 1991), with black Africans showing a 10pp increase in tertiary qualifications.

  • Pre-1950 cohort: 25% of respondents had tertiary education
  • Post-1991 cohort: 33% of respondents had tertiary education
  • Pre-1950 cohort: Black African tertiary attainment 23%
  • Post-1991 cohort: Black African tertiary attainment 33% (10pp increase)
  • Post-1991 cohort: Female tertiary attainment 34% (up from 24% for pre-1950 cohort)
  • Gen Z (born 1997–2006): Mean years of schooling — females 12 years, males 11.8 years
  • Post-1991: 7pp drop in proportion of black Africans with none/only primary education
  • Post-1991: Born in Gauteng average 11.7 years schooling vs 10.5 years for those born elsewhere

Ichikowitz/AmCham African Youth Survey — South Africa Country Report 2024

A survey of 1,046 South African youth aged 18–24 (part of a 16-country African Youth Survey of 5,700 respondents) finds sentiment about the country's direction has plummeted, with 74% saying SA is going the wrong way (up from 50% in 2020). Corruption and unemployment are the top concerns.

  • 2020: 50% of SA youth said country going in wrong direction
  • 2022: 63% said wrong direction
  • 2024: 74% said wrong direction (+24% since 2020)
  • 2020: 34% of SA youth felt optimistic/excited about the future
  • 2024: 16% felt optimistic/excited (down from 34% in 2020)
  • 2022: 61% said national economy heading wrong direction
  • 2024: 71% said economy heading wrong direction
  • 2024: 85% 'very concerned' about corruption (up from 64% in 2022)
  • 2024: 82% 'very concerned' about lack of employment opportunities
  • 2024: 81% 'very concerned' about gender-based violence (up from 72% in 2022)
  • 2024: 76% dissatisfied with government's anti-corruption efforts
  • 2024: 31% would support non-democratic government in some circumstances (up from 22% in 2022)
  • 2024: 63% registered to vote; 69% agree their voice matters to leadership (up from 54% in 2022)
  • 2024: 88% say illegal immigrants take jobs from locals; 85% say they should be forcefully removed
  • 2024: 51% feel everyone is equal before the law; 33% satisfied with police/security services

'I've been trying'. 8 years without a job — Youth Capital Documentary

A short documentary film directed by Eh!woza's Sam Flans with camera work by Alfa Fipaza, narrated by Pearl Thusi, and produced in partnership with advocacy campaign Youth Capital. The film follows nine young South Africans in Cape Town as they navigate job-seeking, studies, and family life two years after COVID-19 lockdowns began. It frames youth unemployment as a systemic problem — not individual failure — and highlights solutions around certification rates, affordable job-seeking, and translating small actions into sustainable livelihoods. The film was screened in over 20 communities during Youth Month 2022.

  • 2022: 4 in 10 young people aged 25–34 were not in employment (QLFS, as cited at time of production)
  • 2022: Over 9.2 million young people not in employment, education, or training (NEET)

The Gen Z Economy Report: Cash, Culture & Clout — Launch Event

Student Village, in partnership with futurist Bronwyn Williams of Flux Trends, launched the Gen Z Economy Report based on a survey of over 900 young South Africans aged 18–30. Key findings challenge the "unemployed Gen Z" stereotype: only 16.6% self-identify as unemployed, with most mixing studies, side hustles, and gigs. Cash remains dominant (80% use it regularly), credit is rare and intimidating, spending on clothing rivals rent (image as social capital), over 90% save monthly, and crypto interest is growing. The report was launched via a live-streamed event from Solid Gold Studios.

  • 2025: Only 16.6% of Gen Z respondents (aged 18–30, n=900+) self-identify as unemployed; most are "underemployed" — mixing studies, side hustles, and gigs
  • 2025: 80% of Gen Z respondents still use cash regularly due to digital access barriers, fees, and trust issues
  • 2025: Over 90% of Gen Z respondents are saving money each month, prioritizing emergency savings and education over retirement

What's Next — Kuben Nair on youth employment, AI and South Africa's jobs future

MyBroadband's What's Next interview with Kubendran Nair, CTO of Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator, covering how AI, digital platforms, and new growth sectors could help address youth unemployment. Nair describes Harambee's founding in 2011, its SA Youth platform with close to 5 million young people and 3,000+ employers, and its track record of helping over 1.6 million young people find work. He uses a personal story of a young woman ("Palesa") to illustrate how conventional hiring practices fail to recognize the real skills and entrepreneurial experience of unemployed youth.

  • 2026: More than 54% of young South Africans are unemployed (as stated by Nair)
  • 2026: 9 million young people currently not working, not studying, not training (NEET)
  • 2026: Harambee has helped over 1.6 million young people find work over 15 years; SA Youth platform has ~5 million registered youth and 3,000+ employers

Economic pressures affecting Africa's youth: African Youth Survey 2026

SABC News interview with Ivor Ichikowitz, commissioner of the African Youth Survey, discussing how South African youth are the most pessimistic on the continent despite rising optimism among youth elsewhere in Africa. Ichikowitz attributes SA youth negativity to an enduring expectation that government should provide, contrasting it with peers across Africa who have adopted an entrepreneurial, self-reliant mindset. The survey also finds that while most African youth believe in democracy, over 50% say they will not vote, signaling a shift in how youth exercise political agency.

  • 2026: African Youth Survey finds South African youth are the most negative/pessimistic of all youth surveyed across the continent
  • 2026: More than 50% of African youth surveyed say they do not plan to vote despite believing in democracy

Case In Point | SA's youth at a crossroads 32 years after democracy?

A live panel discussion from Constitution Hill (Women's Jail, Braamfontein) commemorating Youth Month 2026, featuring youth advocates from Youth Capital, Equal Education, and the Johannesburg Junior Council. Panelists discuss how today's youth face systemic exclusion from the economy, with the struggle having shifted from education access (1976) to employment and economic inclusion (2026). Constitutional Court Judge Jody Kollapen challenges the audience on how history will judge this generation's response to poverty and inequality.

  • 2026: Nearly 10 million young people aged 15–34 are not in employment, education, or training (NEET), as stated by a Youth Capital panelist
  • 2026: 50 years since the 1976 Soweto uprising; 32 years since constitutional democracy began in 1994

WATCH: Unpacking SA youth's debt and unemployment crisis

eNCA's Business Lunch hosts DeHaan Sherman, senior operations manager at National Debt Advisors, to discuss how youth unemployment (nearly 46%) combined with rising living costs is pushing young South Africans into unsecured credit and debt. Sherman identifies job losses, inflation eroding purchasing power, social/family pressures ("black tax"), AI-driven automation eliminating roles, and a lack of financial literacy education as converging factors. The segment also covers the student loan trap and the broader cultural issue of credit misuse.

  • 2026: Youth unemployment at nearly 46%
  • 2026 Q4: Approximately 250,000 young people lost their jobs in the last quarter (as stated by the guest)

Youth Month Discussion | Why are young South Africans still fighting for economic inclusion?

SABC News Youth Month panel featuring Masunwa Abe Fuma (activist and researcher) and Akele Baloyi (NYDA board member), discussing whether young South Africans have gained meaningful economic access 50 years after the 1976 uprising. The theme is "Reset at 50: The Future Calls," with a focus on auditing access for economic inclusion. Baloyi acknowledges the NYDA has not achieved all goals given the 45% youth unemployment rate, while Fuma argues that economic inclusion means not just presence in the economy but fair participation, decent work, and access to finance and decision-making spaces.

  • 2026: 45% youth unemployment rate (as cited by NYDA board member)
  • 2026-06-16: 50th anniversary of the June 16, 1976 Soweto uprising

Discussion | Youth unemployment remains SA's biggest challenge

SABC News discussion with Masidi So Lingwasa, budget analyst at Section 27, about the 2026 Public Economics Conference themed "Counting the Crisis." Lingwasa argues that youth unemployment has been normalized in policy discourse without addressing structural causes — an economy that fails to create jobs, deindustrialization, and fiscal/industrial policies not oriented toward job creation. She highlights the disconnect between billions spent on education and employment programs and actual employment outcomes, noting that even qualified teachers, nurses, and doctors remain unemployed.

  • 2026 Q1: 4.7 million young people aged 15–34 were unemployed (Stats SA, as cited in the segment)
  • 2026: Young black women described as "the face of unemployment" in South Africa

SA's growing youth population deepens labour crisis

SABC News interview with Sharmi Surianarain, Chief Impact Officer at Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator, about the intersection of a growing working-age population and structural macroeconomic stagnation. Surianarain notes that even when GDP grows, young people are disproportionately left behind, and that removing unnecessary experience requirements for entry-level jobs helps but is insufficient. She highlights global business services (offshoring) as a success story for youth absorption but stresses the need for many more such sectors. She also describes the "churn" problem: young people get jobs for 4–18 months then fall out of work again.

  • 2026 Q1: Working-age population (15–64) grown to 42.2 million, with nearly half being youth aged 15–34 (Stats SA QLFS)
  • 2026: Harambee's SA Youth platform has 5 million young people registered, ~2.5 million earning opportunities enabled, and 3,000 employers

Who Are the Youth of 2026? | Three young South Africans building the future

A SABC News documentary-style segment profiling three young South Africans in Gauteng — Brendon Mashala (founder of Ria Ghillie Gaming Interactions in Soweto, building self-service gaming cabinets for townships), Sibusiso Shoangwe (a pantsula dancer from Ramaphosa township near Boksburg), and a third young person — exploring what freedom, opportunity, and impact look like 50 years after 1976. The segment highlights access to funding and resources as a persistent barrier for township-based youth entrepreneurs, and showcases the resilience and "fearless" spirit of the current generation.

  • 2026: Access to funding and resources remains a major barrier for township-based youth entrepreneurs (as described by featured entrepreneur)
  • 2026: 50 years after the 1976 Soweto uprising; the segment frames the current generation's struggle as economic rather than political

Street Debate: 'Black Tax' in South Africa

DW's Edith Kimani hosts a street debate with a group of young professionals in Johannesburg about their experiences with "black tax" — the societal pressure on income-earning black South Africans to share earnings with extended family. The discussion explores how this financial obligation makes it difficult for young professionals to build personal savings or wealth, and the emotional and cultural complexity of navigating family expectations versus individual financial goals.

  • 2020: Young professionals in Johannesburg describe black tax as a mandatory financial obligation that prevents personal wealth accumulation (qualitative, no specific stat cited)

South Africa's Unemployment Crisis: Why Can't People Find Jobs?

An explainer video examining the structural causes of South Africa's unemployment crisis, including the experience-versus-opportunity cycle, education system gaps, corruption, high operating costs for small businesses, and the debate over foreign national employment. The video presents expert consensus that multiple factors — economic growth, education, investment, and skills development — must be addressed simultaneously rather than identifying a single cause.

  • (undated): No specific statistics cited in the video; content is thematic and qualitative

World Bank — Fair Progress? Economic Mobility Across Generations Around the World (GDIM)

The World Bank's landmark report introducing the Global Database on Intergenerational Mobility (GDIM), covering 148 economies and birth cohorts 1940–1989 with 96% world population coverage. It measures both absolute mobility (share of children with more education than parents) and relative mobility (dependence of child's schooling on parents' schooling). Africa and South Asia have the lowest mobility globally.

  • 2018: GDIM covers 148 economies, birth cohorts 1940–1989, 96% of world population
  • 2018: In some low-income African countries, only 12% of young adults born in the 1980s have more education than their parents
  • 2018: The developing world accounts for 46 of the bottom 50 economies in education mobility from bottom to top

World Bank — Global Database on Intergenerational Income Mobility (2025)

A new global database with IGE estimates for 87 countries covering 84% of the world's population, using the Two-Sample Two-Stage Least Squares (TSTSLS) approach with retrospective parental education/occupation data from 156+ surveys. Confirms the Great Gatsby Curve (negative association between mobility and inequality) holds across this wider set of countries, including 44 developing countries. Income mobility is lower in the developing world on average.

  • 2025: IGE ranges from 0.14 (Sweden, lowest) to 0.96 (Madagascar, highest) across 87 countries
  • 2025: Database covers 87 countries, 84% of world population, individuals born in the 1980s–1990s

OECD — A Broken Social Elevator? How to Promote Social Mobility

The OECD's comprehensive report on social mobility across OECD and selected emerging economies. It introduces the "generations to reach mean income" metric — how many generations it takes for children born into the bottom 10% to reach the average income. On average across OECD countries it takes 4–5 generations; Nordic countries need only 2–3. South Africa is tied with Brazil at 9 generations, second-worst after Colombia (11 generations) among 30 countries assessed.

  • 2018: South Africa and Brazil tied at 9 generations for low-income family offspring to reach average income (2nd-worst of 30 countries; only Colombia worse at 11)
  • 2018: OECD average is 4–5 generations; Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden need only 2–3 generations
  • 2018: Report covers 30 countries with IGE-based intergenerational earnings persistence estimates

Corak (2013) — The Great Gatsby Curve: Intergenerational Earnings Elasticity by Country

The seminal paper establishing the "Great Gatsby Curve" — the negative cross-country relationship between income inequality and intergenerational mobility. Provides methodologically adjusted IGE estimates for 22 countries. In Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Finland), less than one-fifth of a father's economic advantage is passed to a son. In Italy, the UK, and the US, roughly 50% of advantage is transmitted. Lower-income countries occupy even higher positions on the curve.

  • 2013: IGE estimates for 22 countries; Nordic countries <0.20; US and UK ~0.50; Italy ~0.50
  • 2013: Cohorts born early-to-mid 1960s, adult outcomes measured mid-to-late 1990s
  • 2013: Negative correlation between Gini coefficient (circa 1985) and intergenerational earnings elasticity

Charles & Hurst (2003) — The Correlation of Wealth Across Generations

The foundational study of intergenerational *wealth* (not income) persistence. Finds an age-adjusted elasticity of child wealth with respect to parental wealth of 0.37 before the transfer of bequests. Lifetime income and asset ownership jointly explain nearly two-thirds of the wealth elasticity; education, past parental transfers, and expected future bequests account for little of the remainder. Suggests children's savings propensities are learned from parents.

  • 2003: Age-adjusted intergenerational wealth elasticity = 0.37 (before bequests transfer)
  • 2003: Lifetime income and asset ownership explain ~2/3 of the wealth elasticity

Chetty et al. (2014) — Rank-Rank Intergenerational Mobility in the United States

Uses administrative earnings records for children born 1971–1993 to measure intergenerational mobility in the US. Introduces the rank-rank specification as a more robust measure than log-log IGE. Finds rank-rank slopes of approximately 0.30 (stable across cohorts) and IGE estimates ranging from 0.26 to 0.70 depending on model specification. Mobility has remained stable even as inequality widened — the "rungs of the ladder grew further apart but children's chances of climbing haven't changed."

  • 2014: Rank-rank slope ≈ 0.30 (stable across 1971–1986 birth cohorts), standard errors < 0.01
  • 2014: IGE estimates range from 0.26 to 0.70 depending on specification (0.45 when excluding zero-income children)
  • 2014: Based on ~3.7 million children per birth cohort from US tax records

Piraino (2015) — Intergenerational Earnings Mobility and Equality of Opportunity in South Africa

The first nationally representative estimates of intergenerational earnings persistence in South Africa, using NIDS (waves 1–3) and PSLSD data with a two-sample two-stage least squares (TSTSLS) approach. Finds IGEs between 0.57 and 0.67 — indicating very low mobility. Race is shown to play a significant role in explaining earnings inequality. Places South Africa among high-inequality emerging economies with low mobility and low equality of opportunity.

  • 2015: South Africa IGE estimates range from 0.57 to 0.67 (using NIDS waves 1–3 and PSLSD)
  • 2015: A limited set of inherited circumstances (including race) explains a significant fraction of earnings inequality among male adults

Finn, Leibbrandt & Ranchhod (2016) — Patterns of Persistence: Intergenerational Mobility and Education in South Africa

Uses NIDS waves 1–4 (2008–2014/15) and the 1993 PSLSD to investigate intergenerational earnings mobility in South Africa. Finds IGEs in the range of 0.61–0.68. The correlation between parent and child earnings is strongest at the top and bottom of the distribution. Correcting for selection into employment (given SA's high unemployment) increases the IGE by approximately 10%. Education accounts for approximately 40% of the total intergenerational earnings elasticity.

  • 2016: South Africa IGE estimates range from 0.61 to 0.68 (using NIDS waves 1–4 and PSLSD)
  • 2016: Correcting for selection into employment increases IGE by ~10%
  • 2016: Education accounts for ~40% of the total intergenerational earnings elasticity

Piketty (2010) — On the Long-Run Evolution of Inheritance: France 1820–2050

The foundational historical study of inheritance flows as a share of national income, tracing France from 1820 to 2010 with projections to 2050. Documents a U-shaped pattern: inheritance flows were 20–25% of national income in the 19th century, fell to less than 5% by 1950 after the World Wars, and rose back to ~15% by 2010. Projects a return to 20–25% by 2050. Demonstrates that when r > g (return on capital exceeds growth), past wealth and inheritance dominate aggregate wealth accumulation.

  • 1820–1910: Annual inheritance flow ≈ 20–25% of national income (France)
  • 1950: Annual inheritance flow falls to <5% of national income (France)
  • 2010: Annual inheritance flow recovers to ≈15% of national income (France)
  • 2050 (projected): Annual bequest flow could reach 20–25% of national income

Alvaredo, Garbinti & Piketty (2017) — On the Share of Inheritance in Aggregate Wealth: Europe and the USA, 1900–2010

Provides historical series on the share of inherited wealth in aggregate private wealth for France, the UK, Germany, Sweden, and the USA over 1900–2010. In Europe, the inheritance share was 70–80% around 1900–10, fell to 30–40% during 1950–80 after the capital shocks of 1914–45, and rose back to 50–60% by 2000–10. The US shows a similar but less pronounced U-shape with greater uncertainty for recent decades.

  • 1900–1910: Inheritance share of aggregate private wealth ≈ 70–80% in Europe
  • 1950–1980: Inheritance share falls to 30–40% in Europe
  • 2000–2010: Inheritance share rises to 50–60% in Europe (and rising)
  • 2000–2010: US pattern U-shaped but less marked, with significant uncertainty

WEF — Global Social Mobility Index 2020

The WEF's inaugural (and only) Global Social Mobility Index, ranking 82 countries across 10 pillars spanning 5 determinants: health, education, technology, work, and institutions. Unlike IGE-based measures, it measures the *causes* of mobility rather than mobility outcomes. Denmark ranked first (85.2); South Africa ranked 77th of 82 (41.4), ahead of only Bangladesh, Pakistan, Cameroon, Senegal, and Ivory Coast. The index has not been updated since 2020.

  • 2020: South Africa ranked 77th of 82 countries, index score 41.4
  • 2020: Denmark ranked 1st with score 85.2; United States 27th (70.4); China 45th (61.5); India 76th (42.7)
  • 2020: A 10% increase in social mobility would boost economic growth, per WEF analysis

Razak (2026) — The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in South Africa

The first study to estimate intergenerational income mobility at the district and metropolitan municipality level in South Africa, using NIDS (2008–2017) and Census 1996 with a TSTSLS approach. Reports national IGE estimates of 0.552–0.623 and rank-rank slopes of 0.264–0.294. Finds substantial spatial heterogeneity linked to former-homeland areas, racial segregation, crime, and school quality. Also cites Ressom (2025) finding IGEs of 0.65–0.83 using NIDS wave 5.

  • 2026: National IGE estimates 0.552 to 0.623; rank-rank slope 0.264 to 0.294
  • 2025: Ressom (2025) documents IGEs of approximately 0.65 to 0.83 using NIDS wave 5
  • 2026: Lower absolute upward mobility associated with higher crime, single-adult households, and racial segregation; higher mobility linked to family stability and quality schooling

Branson & Ressom (2026) — Intergenerational Education Mobility Trends in South Africa

Examines intergenerational educational mobility across cohorts born 1953–1992 using NIDS wave 5, focusing on African, Coloured, and White population groups. Finds gains in upward mobility for African children (especially from low-education backgrounds), stagnation or decline for Coloured children, and persistent White advantages at the top. The education system does not yet function as an equalising force despite post-apartheid expansion.

  • 2026: Study covers cohorts born 1953–1992 using NIDS wave 5
  • 2026: Gains in upward educational mobility for African children from low-education backgrounds; mobility among Coloured children has stagnated or declined
  • 2026: White children retain strong advantages at the top of the education distribution

Credit Suisse — Global Wealth Report 2012 (Inheritance of Wealth Chapter)

The 2012 edition of the Global Wealth Report included a dedicated chapter on "Inheritance of Wealth" — one of the few systematic attempts to estimate the share of inherited vs self-made wealth globally. Found that 69% of Forbes billionaires are self-made (less than one-third inherited), though excluding China/Russia/transition countries raises the inherited share to slightly above one-third. For all OECD households, estimated that 30–50% of wealth is inherited. Global household wealth totaled USD 223 trillion in mid-2012.

  • 2012: 69% of Forbes billionaires are self-made; <1/3 inherited their wealth
  • 2012: 30–50% of OECD household wealth estimated to be inherited
  • 2012: Global household wealth = USD 223 trillion (mid-2012, current exchange rates)

UBS — Billionaire Ambitions Report 2023: The Great Wealth Transfer

The ninth edition of UBS's billionaire report found that, for the first time in nine editions, billionaires accumulated more wealth through inheritance than entrepreneurship. USD 150.8 billion was inherited by 53 heirs, exceeding the USD 140.7 billion accumulated by 84 new self-made billionaires. UBS projects that over 1,000 billionaires will pass an estimated USD 5.2 trillion to their children over the next 20 years, signaling an accelerating "great wealth transfer."

  • 2023: USD 150.8 billion inherited by 53 heirs vs USD 140.7 billion by 84 new self-made billionaires (first time inheritance exceeded entrepreneurship)
  • 2023: Over 1,000 billionaires expected to pass USD 5.2 trillion to children over next 20 years
  • 2023: 98% of billionaires in Mainland China are self-made (contrasting with global trend)

Davis Tax Committee Wealth Tax Report — Estate Duty and Wealth Tax Feasibility

The Davis Tax Committee's 2018 report on the feasibility of a wealth tax in South Africa highlights the structural barriers to taxing wealth. South Africa's wealth-to-income ratio is ~240%, lower than wealthy nations (400–700%), limiting potential wealth tax revenue. Estate duty is the only existing tax on wealth itself. Retirement funds (~R2.2 trillion) constitute roughly a quarter of total household wealth holdings (~R9.5 trillion). The estate duty rate is 20% on the dutiable amount above a R3.5 million abatement, rising to 25% on estates above R30 million (since 2018).

  • 2018: South Africa's wealth-to-income ratio ~240% (vs 400–700% in wealthy nations)
  • 2018: Retirement funds ~R2.2 trillion ≈ ~25% of total household wealth (~R9.5 trillion)
  • 2018: Estate duty rate increased from 20% to 25% on dutiable amounts above R30 million
  • 2010–2011: Estate duty generates only 0.1% of total tax revenue (per Orthofer 2016)
  • 2018: R3.5 million estate duty abatement per estate

Wealth Inequality in South Africa, 1993–2017

This landmark study combines tax microdata (covering the universe of income tax returns), household surveys, and SARB macroeconomic balance sheets to estimate the distribution of personal wealth in South Africa from 1993 to 2017. It documents unparalleled levels of wealth concentration with no sign of decreasing inequality since the end of apartheid. The authors note that wealth concentration within each age group is almost identical to the full population, pointing to the importance of inherited wealth as a driver.

  • 2017: Top 10% of adults own 85.6% of aggregate wealth; top 1% own 54.7%; top 0.1% own 29.8%; top 0.01% (3,500 individuals) own 14.9% — more than the bottom 90% as a whole (14.4%)
  • 2017: Bottom 50% of adults have negative net worth (–2.5% of total wealth); average wealth of bottom 50% is –R16,000 (2018 rands)
  • 2017: Top 1% owns 95.2% of all bonds and corporate shares; bottom 50% owns 0%
  • 1993–2017: Top 10% wealth share fluctuated between 80% and 90% with no long-run downward trend
  • 1993–2017: Top 1% wealth share grew from 54% to 57%; top 0.1% share grew from 22% to 31%
  • 2017: Top 10% own 99.8% of bonds and stock; 62.7% of currency; 58.8% of housing wealth; 63.8% of pensions/life insurance

The Racial Wealth Gap in South Africa and the United States

This study compares the Black–White racial wealth gap in South Africa to the well-documented gap in the United States. It finds strikingly similar patterns: the typical Black South African household owns only 5% of the wealth held by the typical White household, compared to 6% in the US. The racial wealth gap persists at different levels of education and income in both countries, suggesting structural rather than individual determinants.

  • 2024 (data referenced): Typical Black South African household owns 5% of the wealth held by the typical White household
  • 2024 (data referenced): Typical Black US household owns 6% of the wealth held by the typical White household
  • 2024 (data referenced): Racial wealth gap exists at different levels of education and income in both countries

Wealth Inequality – Insights from Survey and Tax Data

Orthofer's pioneering study uses a 20% sample of personal income tax (PIT) records for 2010–2011, combined with NIDS Wave 2 data, to estimate wealth inequality. She finds wealth is far more concentrated than income, with the top 10% owning at least 90–95% of all assets. The estate duty is noted as generating only 0.1% of total tax revenue, highlighting the weak taxation of intergenerational wealth transfers.

  • 2010–2011: Wealth Gini coefficient estimated at 0.9–0.95 (income Gini ~0.7)
  • 2010–2011: Top 10% own at least 90–95% of all wealth; bottom 50% own no measurable wealth
  • 2010–2011: Middle 40% of income distribution earn 30–35% of income but own only 5–10% of wealth
  • 2010–2011: Estate duty generates only 0.1% of total tax revenue
  • 2010–2011: More than 80% of the adult population receives too little income to be in the personal income tax system

The Distribution of Household Wealth in South Africa Using NIDS Wave 5

This paper analyzes nationally representative wealth data from NIDS Wave 5, including household assets, liabilities and net worth. It finds extreme inequality in asset and debt distribution, with the top decile owning 72.7% of all assets. The wealth Gini for net worth is 0.83, significantly higher than the income Gini of 0.61. Financial asset inequality is exceptionally high at 0.97.

  • 2017/18: Net worth Gini coefficient = 0.83 (down from 0.90 in 2014/15); income Gini = 0.61
  • 2017/18: Financial assets Gini = 0.97
  • 2017/18: Median household derived net worth = R20,516; mean = R665,699 (weighted)
  • 2017/18: Top asset decile owns 72.7% of total assets (median value R2,534,540); bottom decile owns 0.07%
  • 2017/18: Only 48.6% of households report positive net worth; 25.1% break even; 3.5% in debt; 21.6% don't know

Inherited Wealth in Post-Apartheid South Africa: New Perspectives from Probate Records

This study uses novel probate records to estimate the scale of the racial wealth divide in South Africa 30 years after apartheid. It finds that 45% of White South African adults own inheritable wealth of at least R250,000, compared to only 3% of Black adults. The gaps narrowed only modestly between 2009 and 2019. Black South Africans leaving estates are primarily township dwellers, suggesting limited integration into the historically White-owned asset stock.

  • 2009–2019: 45% of White SA adults own inheritable wealth ≥ R250,000 vs 3% of Black, 9% of Coloured, 23% of Asian/Indian adults
  • 2009–2019: Gaps in inheritable wealth ownership narrowed only modestly over the decade
  • 2009–2019: 42% of Black estate holders were resident in former apartheid-era townships at death; 17% in former Homelands

How the Legacy of Apartheid Geography Shapes Housing Wealth

Using NIDS panel data from 2008 to 2017, this study examines how apartheid-era spatial segregation continues to shape housing wealth accumulation. Over 90% of individuals from marginalised groups remain in areas historically designated for their race. Housing accounts for 40–65% of total household assets, but state-provided housing in peripheral locations functions as "spatial traps" rather than wealth-building assets. The absolute gap in housing wealth between white and African urban residents has widened dramatically over the decade.

  • 1994–2018: Top 10% held ~85% of total household wealth throughout the period; top 1% share reached 55% in 2017
  • 2008: Average white imputed rent in urban formal areas = R2,740 vs R461 for African-occupied dwellings (ratio ~6:1)
  • 2017: Average white imputed rent = R9,424 vs R1,627 for African-occupied dwellings (absolute gap widened)
  • 2008–2017: Over 90% of individuals from marginalised groups remained in areas historically designated for their race; ~94% of tribal authority area residents stayed
  • 1913/1950: Natives Land Act (1913) and Group Areas Act (1950) systematically locked out Black South Africans from land/property ownership in urban centres

SA's Wealth Inequality Has Increased Significantly Over Past Two Decades — UBS Report

The UBS (formerly Credit Suisse) Global Wealth Report 2023 provides internationally comparable wealth Gini coefficients. South Africa's wealth Gini rose to 88.8 (on a 0–100 scale) at end-2022, up from 80.4 in 2000, making it the highest among selected markets, above Brazil at 88.4. Financial assets make up 69.2% of gross assets in South Africa (vs 68.1% in 2000), relatively stable composition.

  • 2000: South Africa wealth Gini = 80.4 (on 0–100 scale)
  • 2022: South Africa wealth Gini = 88.8 (on 0–100 scale), highest among selected markets (Brazil = 88.4)
  • 2000–2022: Financial assets as share of gross assets remained relatively stable: 68.1% (2000) → 69.2% (2022)

OECD: To Have and Have Not — How to Bridge the Gap in Opportunities

This is the OECD Observatory on Social Mobility and Equal Opportunity's flagship report, extending the analysis from "A Broken Social Elevator?" (2018). It develops a new measure of inequality of opportunity and finds that over a quarter of total disparities in market income can be attributed to circumstances beyond individual control (sex, place of birth, parental background). The report observes a slight average decrease in equality of opportunity, with top performers declining and lower-performing countries improving.

  • 2025: Over 25% of total disparities in market income across OECD countries attributable to circumstances beyond individual control (sex, place of birth, parental socio-economic background)
  • 2025: Slight decrease in equality of opportunity on average across OECD; top performers declining while lower-performing countries improving
  • 2025: Over the past 15 years, policies have been more effective at reducing disparities in outcomes than at addressing long-term barriers to equality of opportunity

OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1858: Intergenerational Social Mobility Across OECD Countries

This working paper exploits the 2023 OECD Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) to deliver fresh cross-country estimates of intergenerational social mobility for 29 OECD countries. It finds that individuals with high-educated parents earn almost 30% more on average than those with low-educated parents. In many countries, equalizing education is not sufficient — parental background continues to influence economic outcomes even among individuals with similar education levels.

  • 2026: Individuals with high-educated parents earn ~30% more on average than those with low-educated parents across OECD countries (based on 2023 PIAAC data)
  • 2026: New cross-country intergenerational social mobility estimates for 29 OECD countries covering earnings, women's labour market participation, and educational attainment
  • 2026: In several countries, parental background continues to significantly influence offspring's economic outcomes even after controlling for own education and skills

WID.world: New Estimates of Wealth Inequality from Estate Distribution (incl. South Africa)

This working paper (WP 2025/02) establishes a simplified estate multiplier method to estimate top wealth shares using only minimal estate and mortality data. The method is applied to produce new long-run top wealth share series for Belgium, Japan, and South Africa — countries where estate data had been previously underutilized. This is particularly significant for South Africa, where wealth inequality estimates from estates had not been systematically constructed before.

  • 2025: New long-run top wealth share series produced for Belgium, Japan, and South Africa using estate distribution data
  • 2025: Simplified estate multiplier method validated and applied — particularly relevant for expanding wealth concentration estimates in countries where standard methods are inapplicable

WID.world: Global Wealth Accumulation and Ownership Patterns, 1800–2025

This working paper (WP 2025/22) constructs the first global database of wealth accumulation covering 1800–2025, drawing on national balance sheets and reconstructed historical series. It finds that global wealth-income ratios have risen dramatically from ~390% of world net domestic product in 1980 to over 625% in 2025, driven by higher savings and capital gains. Average returns to capital declined from 7.5% to 5.6% but remained above income growth rates.

  • 2025: Global wealth-income ratio exceeded 625% of world net domestic product (up from ~390% in 1980)
  • 2025: Average returns to capital declined from 7.5% (1980) to 5.6% (2025), yet remained above income growth rates
  • 2025: Public wealth turned negative in North America, fell near zero in Europe; East Asia stabilized with 25–30% of national wealth in public hands

UBS Global Wealth Report 2026

The 17th edition of the UBS Global Wealth Report reports the fastest wealth growth in years, with personal wealth rising over 10% and nearly one million new dollar millionaires added globally. The report covers 56 key markets accounting for over 92% of world wealth.

  • 2026: Personal wealth rose by over 10%, the fastest pace in years
  • 2026: Nearly one million new USD millionaires added globally — more than 2,600 per day

UBS Global Wealth Report 2025

The 16th edition reports 4.6% global wealth growth in 2024, driven largely by North America. It introduces the "EMILLI" (Everyday Millionaire) segment — 52 million people with $1–5 million in investable assets holding $107 trillion — and provides detailed projections for the great wealth transfer, with $83 trillion expected to move over 20–25 years.

  • 2024: Global wealth grew 4.6%; average wealth per adult in North America was USD 593,347, Oceania USD 496,696, Western Europe USD 287,688
  • 2024: Number of USD millionaires rose 1.2%, adding 684,000+ people; the US added over 379,000 new millionaires (more than 1,000/day)
  • 2024: EMILLIs (Everyday Millionaires, $1–5M investable assets) numbered ~52 million globally, holding ~USD 107 trillion
  • 2025: Over the next 20–25 years, USD 83+ trillion expected to be transferred — USD 9 trillion horizontally between spouses, USD 74 trillion intergenerationally; largest volumes in the US (over USD 29 trillion), Brazil (nearly USD 9 trillion), mainland China (over USD 5 trillion)

UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report 2025

The 11th edition reports record global billionaire wealth of $15.8 trillion in 2025, with 196 self-made billionaires adding $386.5 billion. The great wealth transfer accelerated: 91 heirs inherited a record $297.8 billion, 36% more than 2024. Multi-generational billionaires now number ~860 with $4.7 trillion in assets, up from 805 with $4.2 trillion in 2024.

  • 2025: Global billionaire wealth reached USD 15.8 trillion (all-time high); number of billionaires rose 8.8% from 2,682 to nearly 3,000
  • 2025: 196 self-made billionaires added USD 386.5 billion to global wealth — second-highest annual increase in report history
  • 2025: 91 heirs inherited a record USD 297.8 billion, up 36% from 2024; ~860 multi-generational billionaires oversaw USD 4.7 trillion (up from USD 4.2 trillion in 2024)
  • 2025: Second-generation billionaires grew 4.6%, third-generation by 12.3%, fourth-generation and beyond by 10%

UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report 2024

The 10th anniversary edition tracks billionaire wealth from 2015–2024, finding total wealth grew 121% to $14 trillion. In 2024, 268 people became billionaires for the first time, 60% of them self-made entrepreneurs — reversing the prior year's pattern where most new billionaires were inheritors. Over the 10-year study, multigenerational billionaires inherited a total of $1.3 trillion.

  • 2024: Total billionaire wealth reached USD 14.0 trillion (up 121% from USD 6.3 trillion in 2015); number of billionaires was 2,682 (up from 1,757 in 2015)
  • 2024: 268 new billionaires, 60% self-made entrepreneurs; US billionaire wealth rose 27.6% to USD 5.8 trillion (40%+ of global billionaire wealth)
  • 2024: Baby boomer billionaires' heirs and philanthropic causes set to inherit estimated USD 6.3 trillion over the next 15 years (up from USD 5.2 trillion estimate in 2023 report)
  • 2015–2024: Multigenerational billionaires inherited a cumulative USD 1.3 trillion over the 10-year study period

World Inequality Database (WID.world) 2025 Update

The 2025 WID update covers 216 countries with data going back to 1820 for some series. It revises income inequality rankings (Latin America re-emerges as most unequal region, overtaking MENA, due to newly accessed administrative data for Brazil and Chile showing top 1% shares were previously underestimated). The update extends wealth distribution series worldwide from 1980 and back to 1820 for a limited set of countries, and publishes the DINA Guidelines 2025 (third edition).

  • 2025: WID covers 216 countries; wealth distribution series extended from 1980 worldwide and back to 1820 for limited countries
  • 2025: Latin America re-emerges as most unequal region (overtaking MENA) based on revised top 1% income share estimates for Brazil and Chile; Europe remains least unequal
  • 2025: DINA Guidelines 2025 (third edition) published — revised macroeconomic aggregates, updated income and wealth definitions, enhanced data-quality flags

Knight Frank Wealth Report 2026

The 20th edition of Knight Frank's Wealth Report reveals dramatic acceleration in global wealth creation. Between 2021 and 2026, the global UHNWI population (those worth $30M+) rose from 551,435 to 713,626 — 162,191 new UHNWIs, or 89 people crossing the $30M threshold every day. The world's 3,110 billionaires are more geographically dispersed than the broader UHNW population.

  • 2026: Global UHNWI population ($30M+) reached 713,626, up from 551,435 in 2021 — 162,191 new UHNWIs over five years (89 per day)
  • 2026: World's 3,110 billionaires are more geographically dispersed than broader UHNW population; North America leads with 37% of UHNW wealth, Asia-Pacific ~31%, Europe ~25%
  • 2026: India's UHNW population surged 63% between 2021 and 2026, from ~12,000 to nearly 20,000

Allianz Global Wealth Report 2025

The 16th edition of the Allianz Global Wealth Report finds global household financial assets reached a record €269 trillion ($312.6 trillion) in 2024, growing 8.7%. North America was responsible for 53.6% of global asset growth. Within most countries, the richest 10% still hold about 60% of total wealth — unchanged in 20 years. The report warns that the long-run narrowing between rich and poor nations has "more or less come to a standstill" since 2017.

  • 2024: Global household financial assets reached €269 trillion (USD 312.6 trillion), growing 8.7% (up from 8.0% in 2023)
  • 2024: Richest 10% hold ~60% of total wealth within most countries — unchanged in 20 years
  • 2024: North America responsible for 53.6% of global asset growth; US holds ~half of all global financial assets
  • 2024: Net financial assets jumped 10.3% to €210 trillion (USD 244.3 trillion); global household debt grew only 3.1%, averaging 62.6% of GDP (down 8pp from 20 years ago)

SARB Household Finances — Q4 2025 (via Nedbank Economics)

Nedbank's quarterly summary of SARB Quarterly Bulletin household-sector data. Household balance sheets strengthened further in Q4 2025 as rising share prices and firmer house prices lifted asset values faster than liabilities. The JSE All-Share Index surged 37.7% in 2025, driving a significant increase in net wealth. However, household dissaving deepened to the worst level since Q3 2016, and the debt-to-income ratio remained elevated.

  • Q4 2025: Household debt to disposable income ratio was 61.8% (down from 62.7% for full year 2024)
  • Q4 2025: Household net wealth to disposable income ratio rose to 441% (from 432% in Q3); full-year 2025 ratio was 425% (up from 398% in 2024)
  • 2025: JSE All-Share Index surged 37.7%, the primary driver of the increase in household net wealth
  • Q4 2025: Personal savings rate deteriorated to -1.4% of disposable income, the deepest since Q3 2016; full-year 2025 savings rate was -1.2%

SARS Tax Statistics 2025 (18th Edition)

The 18th annual edition of the Tax Statistics bulletin, covering tax years 2021–2024 and fiscal years 2020/21–2024/25. SARS collected a record R2.3 trillion in gross tax revenue in 2024/25, with the tax-to-GDP ratio rising to 25.1%. Personal Income Tax remained the largest contributor at 39.5% of total tax revenue. Retirement funding contributions were the largest share of deductions at R278.7 billion.

  • 2024/25: SARS collected R2.3 trillion in gross tax revenue (6.9% more than 2023/24); net tax revenue was R1.9 trillion (6.6% growth)
  • 2024/25: Tax-to-GDP ratio was 25.1% (up from 22.3% in 2020/21)
  • 2024 tax year: Assessed taxpayers reported aggregated taxable income of R2.7 trillion with tax liability of R563.3 billion at an average tax rate of 20.8%
  • 2024 tax year: Contributions to retirement funding (pension, provident, retirement annuity funds) were the largest share of deductions at R278.7 billion (83.7% of total deductions)

Racial Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Apartheid South Africa (WID Working Paper 2025/27)

A major new analysis by Czajka & Gethin (November 2025) combining survey, tax, national accounts, and budget data from 1993 to 2019 using the DINA methodology. The paper finds that South Africa "still stands today as the most unequal country for which comparable statistics are available." The White-to-Black per capita factor income ratio was halved from its mid-2000s peak of 17 to 9 by 2019, driven largely by top Black income growth, but the gap remains extreme by international standards. The tax-and-transfer system reduced inequality but has not become more efficient at narrowing racial disparities.

  • 2025 (publication): South Africa "still stands today as the most unequal country for which comparable statistics are available"
  • 2019 (data): Factor income Gini coefficient was 0.81 with a top 10% income share of 70%; White-to-Black per capita factor income ratio had fallen to 9 (from 17 in mid-2000s)
  • 2019 (data): Black South Africans earned 17% of the average disposable income and owned 6% of the average wealth of White South Africans; average White per capita income was comparable to Denmark, while average Black income was comparable to Bangladesh

Knight Frank Wealth Report 2025

The 19th edition of Knight Frank's Wealth Report, based on responses from over 600 private bankers and wealth advisors managing over $3 trillion. The global number of individuals with wealth exceeding $10 million grew 4.4% in 2024. South Africa had 5,212 individuals in this bracket. Africa as a region saw 4.7% growth in $10M+ individuals, and Cape Town's prime residential market grew 5.1%.

  • 2024: South Africa had 5,212 individuals with wealth exceeding $10 million (out of a global total of 2,341,378)
  • 2024: Cape Town prime residential prices increased 5.1%, ranking 32nd globally on the Prime International Residential Index
  • 2024: Africa recorded 4.7% growth in the number of $10M+ individuals

Africa Wealth Report 2025

The 4th edition of the Africa Wealth Report, published by Henley & Partners with New World Wealth. South Africa remains Africa's wealthiest country, accounting for 34% of the continent's millionaires — roughly equal to the next five wealthiest countries combined. Johannesburg is Africa's wealthiest city with 11,700 resident millionaires, while Cape Town ranks second with 8,500 and leads the continent in centi-millionaires.

  • 2025: South Africa had 41,100 resident US dollar millionaires (34% of Africa's total of 122,500)
  • 2025: Johannesburg had 11,700 resident millionaires (Africa's wealthiest city); Cape Town had 8,500 millionaires and 35 centi-millionaires
  • 2025: Africa's millionaire population is projected to grow 65% over the next decade

Africa Wealth Report 2026

The latest edition of the Africa Wealth Report, with figures as at June 2026. South Africa has consolidated its position as Africa's wealthiest country, now accounting for 38% of the continent's millionaires and 36% of its billionaires. SA ranked 34th globally by millionaire residents, just behind Poland and ahead of Turkey and Thailand.

  • June 2026: South Africa had 48,200 resident HNWIs (US dollar millionaires), 131 centi-millionaires, and 10 billionaires — 38% of Africa's total millionaires
  • June 2026: South Africa ranked 34th wealthiest country globally by millionaire residents

World Inequality Database 2025 Update

The WID 2025 annual update, covering 216 countries with data extending to 2024 for some countries. The update extended wealth distribution series from 1980 worldwide and back to 1820 for a limited set of countries. It published the third edition of the DINA (Distributional National Accounts) Guidelines and included a specific "2025 DINA Update for countries of the Sub-Saharan Africa region" technical note. The update notes that current wealth inequality estimates "remain unsatisfactory due to limited access to country-level household wealth survey and tax data."

  • 2025 (update): WID extended wealth distribution series from 1980 worldwide, with data going back as far as 1820 to 2024 for some countries
  • 2025 (update): Published "2025 DINA Update for countries of the Sub-Saharan Africa region" as a dedicated technical note (WID Technical Note 2025/04)

National Treasury Rejects Wealth Tax Proposal

In May 2025, ahead of the third attempt to pass Budget 2025, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana stated in Parliament that he does not think a wealth tax is a good idea, arguing that wealthy individuals already pay tax through multiple other channels. This formally closed the door on wealth tax proposals that had been discussed since the Davis Tax Committee's 2018 exploration of the topic.

  • May 2025: Finance Minister Godongwana formally rejected a wealth tax proposal in Parliament, stating the wealthy already contribute through existing tax instruments